dating

'Until the gender pay gap closes, I'm happy being a gold digger.'

I think I might be a gold digger, but not in the way you'd imagine. My boyfriend isn't 40 years older than me, and he isn't a millionaire, but I value financial security in a partner. 

It's something I've always actively searched for and considered necessary. Why? Because men earn more than women, and I'm aware that getting financially ahead as a woman is a bloody hard slog! 

According to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency, women typically earn $25,000 a year less than men. According to Australian Super - to break it down further - on average, women earn $241 less a week than men and retire with 42 per cent less superannuation. 

Basically, it still pays to be a man. Yet we still judge women for trying to obtain financial security through romantic relationships. 

Watch: The gender pay gap, explained. Post continues below.

Now, I should stress that I think it's very important for women to have their own careers and make sure they have a skill that means they can always support themselves.

You never want to be entirely financially dependent on a man, at least not if you can help it. I think it's important to know you could leave any relationship and be able to provide for yourself just fine. 

I am also happy to be part of a team that works towards securing financial stability, I’d even be prepared be the primary earner but unfortunately, according to the stats, as a woman, I’m way more likely to earn less. 

Because if we are talking about getting ahead, if you want to do more than just pay for rent and the occasional splurge, partnering with a man is probably the way to go. Alone, the battle is all uphill. 

Now, it shouldn't be like this, but the financial odds just aren't in my favour. The figures are literally staring me in the face. Women earn less than men, and it's unfair and awful but not changing anytime soon. 

The World Economic Forum estimates that at the current rate of progress, the gender gap will end in 267.6 years. 

I would imagine this opinion is probably making you uncomfortable as you read it. Why? Because it seems so absurd that in 2022 the easiest way for women to actually get ahead financially is still by pairing up. Depressing, right? 

But it's the uncomfortable truth. It doesn't matter how hard I work, how much I girl boss, and what I sacrifice. It's more likely the guy I'm chatting with on Tinder is earning more than me, oh, and he doesn't even have to have a degree to bring home more cash. 

I often find that as women we are comfortable talking about how society oppresses us and the obstacles we are up against. 

Listen to The Quicky, Mamamia's daily news podcast. Post continues below. 


Still, we find it hard to stomach how we navigate this practically. No self-respecting feminist wants to admit that living with a partner is a huge financial load off their shoulders. Because it just doesn't seem very cool or edgy or progressive, but it's bloody true. I suppose this is where I also struggle. 

I want to fight the good fight. I want to scream at the top of my lungs that I don't need a man! But the truth is I kind of do, at least if I want to have any hopes of getting into the property market, and that's hard to swallow, isn't it? Don't worry, it makes me uncomfortable too.

Now, of course, I love my boyfriend. I've chosen him because he is kind, warm and calm, but I'm also aware long-term if I needed him to, he'd be able to support me, and I can't pretend that isn't part of what makes our relationship feel comforting.

Together, we are willing to work towards our financial security.

Alone, we would both struggle. And yes, I said 'both'. But my struggle would be just that bit harder. Around 20 per cent harder. We are both around the same age, have similar educations, and work hard, but you guessed it. He earns more. 

I know as a society we love to shame women who reach financial security through any other means but hard work, but the game isn't set in our favour, so can you really blame women for thinking maybe I'll just meet a nice man who earns a lot instead? I mean, what's the alternative? Working hard and watching a male contemporary earn 20 per cent more? While you will always have 20 per cent less? 

So this is why you can call me a gold digger. Because I am desperately trying to find a way to feel more equal in this world. I want to be financially secure, to not be at the mercy of landlords or a mercurial employment environment or sexist employers.

Right now, the way to do that might just be through pairing up with a man, and if that makes you mad, it should. I'm bloody furious.

Feature Image: Supplied.

Can’t live without your phone or the internet? Take our survey now and you could win a $50 gift voucher!

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

gu3st 3 years ago 5 upvotes
It's this attitude, aggregated, that keeps the pay gap wider, because doesn't it encourage "I could go ask for that pay rise, but that's deeply uncomfortable for me and in the end, I've got my male partner's larger income to fall back on, so...I'm just going to avoid that discomfort for now."

On the male's side, this attitude fosters, on some level, the knowledge that a substantial part of what makes him attractive as a long-term partner, is his ability to offer that financial security, so he leans in and pushes for the pay rise, despite him also finding this a task that he doesn't savour.

So, I posit that, as long as a goldigger attitude persists, it self-fulfills the status quo.
mamamia-user-482898552 3 years ago 1 upvotes
@gu3st Spot on. It's such a depressing, defeatist attitude. It boils down to "the gender gap is going to take more than three life times to close, so I'm not going to do anything about it" . Meanwhile, the absolute risk of using someone else as your financial security is completely glossed over - all while we know many women in middle age are left in incredibly precarious financial situations when their relationships falter. 
cat 3 years ago
@gu3st It is going to take 3 generations though, so why do women have to pretend it wont? The worst thing we can do is pretend that these issues are able to be changed by individual women and put the responsibility back on them to overcome systemic disadvantage through a plucky attitude.

We should absolutely all advocate for change but that change has to come from policy and social pressure, it's not going to come from women asking for a pay rise. That is not the crux of the issue here. 
mb1111 3 years ago 2 upvotes
@gu3st I agree with you. Women on an individual level need to seek higher pay. This typically requires hard work. Men do this all the time. 
cat 3 years ago
@mb1111 you cannot solve systemic inequality by telling individuals to work harder. Would you tell people of colour to just work harder at their jobs to overcome racist hiring policies? Should individual women have personally gotten the right to vote, instead of securing it for all women? 

Personal responsibility as a solution  is only ever pushed by those who want to uphold inequality and prevent change. It just tries to pit women against each other and pretend theres a meritocracy in place, to prevent all women working together to protest. Legislation and social awareness are the only possible ways to close the gender pay gap. 

daijobou 3 years ago
It’s funny, reading this I think it’s true - I did subconsciously choose a partner who was educated to the same level, has similar high earning power to me, and same work ethic…. would people think I’m arrogant or elitist to not want a partner with a smaller income or less educated? I’m not sure if it’s because I grew up with a family where my mum was both the breadwinner and the person who did everything at home, I was very conscious that I didn’t want someone I would eventually be financially responsible for.  
simple simon 3 years ago
@daijobou  I did subconsciously choose a partner who was educated to the same level, has similar high earning power to me
I think most women are quite open about that.
daijobou 3 years ago
@simple simon Yes -  I think many women are scared of being both the main breadwinner and still having to do all the work at home, whereas for men if they are the main breadwinner they feel comfortable knowing they won’t have to work then come home and still do everything.
I even had an ex boyfriend joke how once I finished uni and got a job he could just spend his days living in leisure and focus on his rock band!