friendship

Want to feel happier? Start cutting people out of your friendship circle.

Smart people want fewer friends. That’s what the research says. Published research in the British Journal of Psychology no less.

It’s no secret, and in fact it has been proven countless times, that having friends and interacting with them regularly helps with people’s happiness and feelings of well-being. Friends are as beneficial to your health as quitting smoking, and isolated people run twice the risk of dying from heart disease than those with a solid circle of friends.

But this new research (taken from 15,000 participants aged 18-28) found that shrinking the friendship circle made the smarter ones in the group happier.

Smart people don’t like too many people it seems. Why would you, if you had to constantly correct some “friends” pronunciation of cerebral?

The Savannah Theory of Happiness, conducted by evolutionary psychologists Satoshi Kanazawa of the London School of Economics and Norman Li of Singapore Management University, has gained a lot of traction and attention with The Washington Post this week calling this type of modern social friendship behaviour “Paleo Happiness”.

Like the Paleo diet, according to The Washington Post this is another Paleo theory that has its origins in “the idea that our bodies are best adapted to the environment of our earliest ancestors.”

Back in the Paleo days, caves were homes, communication was via iGrunt and humans needed each other to survive. Friends were useful as well as great to bore with another story of that lion kill near the waterhole. There were no cities, just groups of people – around 150 – living their entire lives together. Being social, helping with hunting and fighting off predators, was essential for surviving another day.

Kanazawa and Li believe the hunter gatherer simple lifestyle our ancestors lived by forms the basis of our happiness today. (As evolutionary psychologists, that whole We-Do- Everything-Because-Our-Ancestors-Did-It really is the starting point so no surprises there).

That’s why the study also found that people living in high density areas reported less overall happiness. Remember: they didn’t have high density out in the savannah. Tall trees don’t count.

The Paleo diet has been pioneered by chef Pete Evans. Listen to the Mamamia Out Loud podcast below as they weigh in on the fad. Post continues after audio… 

But what was harder to explain in the study, according to News Every Day was why “intelligent individuals were actually less satisfied with life if they socialized with their friends more frequently.”

A reason could be because smarter people are more focused on another long term goal (think curing cancer, finishing off that biography of Karl Marx). Or despite the modern world being unsuitable for happiness and health – hence the rash of Paleo theories – smarter people are better at adapting all the way to less social interaction if needed.

I have another theory about so-called Paleo Happiness. Smarter people can’t be bothered. They’ve shut up the friendship shop. They’re pruning the friendship tree rather than fertilising it. They have enough friends. They don’t need anymore.

Last year Time Magazine reported that quality beats quantity when it comes to friends and you need three to five friends for optimal well-being.

What’s the last text you received from your best friend? Our team reveal their’s below. Post continues after video…

How many do you talk to regularly? How many can you call if you are in real trouble? How many could you travel overseas with?

Realistically would you really tell your hopes, dreams and secrets to 22 “friends”? Would you realistically find 19 “friends” who would laugh when you attempt the Pasa Doble at 1am? Yes, you want heaps of people to turn up to your funeral but there is a limit to how many people you can emotionally invest in right now.

That’s another thing smart people know. Forget Paleo Happiness as the reason for smart people thinning out their friendship groups and socialising less frequently. Smart people know less is often more.

And they’re tired and just can’t be bothered to go out tonight. And sometimes they want to stay home and watch Netflix. And sometimes they can’t like or love every single one of your Facebook pics because they need to eat.

Limiting the numbers in your friendship group and the amount of your social interactions isn’t Paleo Happiness. It’s smart. That’s why smart people do it.

Click through the gallery below for some of our favourite celebrity friendships…

Celebrity BFFs.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

I guess this fits my experience, if biased. I'm above average in intelligence (according to IQ tests since childhood), have diverse intellectual interests, and constantly read difficult material. So, I'm 'learned' in that I know a little bit about a lot of things, though a college drop out; i.e., an autodidact. I was raised by college-educated professionals, both with teaching careers, one a public school teacher and the other a professor. That meant I had instilled in me a love of learning that, obviously, I don't personally identify with and limit to higher education. 

Having grown up in and still living in a college town, I'm surrounded by those of above average IQ. Being a well read intellectual doesn't necessarily make one particularly special in a college town. If anything, being surrounded by lots of smart informed people is humbling, as it's easy to meet someone who knows something you don't. An important part of being smart is realizing the limits of one's intellect and knowledge --- indeed, research shows less smart people tend to think they're smarter than they are.

Most of my closest friends and most of my immediate family members have college degrees, strongly correlated to IQ. It is true that, among this group, having a large numbers of friends is less common. Also, people in a community like this don't tend to be surrounded by a large kin network either. At present, I have 4 close friends with 3 of them having lasted more than 2 decades, one of those going back to early childhood. Am I predisposed to a small group of friends because I'm reasonably intelligent? I don't know. It's an interesting thought to consider.
I would add a qualification to one theory mentioned. I'm not sure that smart people are on average less happy. Consider that intelligence and liberalism have been closely associated in thousands of studies on personality, social views, politics, etc; as both seem to be expressions of the common factor of the dual personality trait openness/intellectuality. 

What studies have found is that conservatives self-report themselves as happier, apparently as an expression of conforming to a normative identity. But other studies have shown is that observers measure liberals as smiling more often and more genuinely (Duchenne smile that includes wrinkling around eyes). There is a big difference between those two.

Anon 8 years ago

Well that's good to know, I thought the reason I only had a few friends was because I was an obnoxious boring know it all, but it turns out I'm just super smart and ahead of my time. I'll make sure I point this out to people at parties who make the mistake of approaching me, no doubt my superior intelligence will make them beat a hasty retreat! Hee hee!

Well I just saw big fat Greek wedding 2 where main character can barely breathe without all her relatives, but not a friend in sight, there's someone who needs more friends (at least one outside her own culture to gain another perspective) and way less family. I saw this movie with a friend myself who I like a lot but after reading this article I may have to cull her! Hee hee.

Well I don't feel I have enough friends actually. However I have finally got about 5 friends who I really click with. They are all seperate friends. In the past at times I've felt like I had a lot of nice friends but not a lot in common. I finally have these ones who I feel I have a lot in common with so that's very nice. I do agree that the quality is better than the quantity.