news

What Narelda Jacobs wants people to know after the Queen's death.

Four days on from the Queen's death, Narelda Jacobs says Indigenous Australians would have liked to see more change during the monarch's seven decades on the throne.

Speaking on Studio 10 on Monday morning, the journalist and proud Whadjuk Noongar woman shared her father, who was an activist and reverend for the Uniting Church, met with the Queen four times before she passed. 

"When my dad met with the Queen those four times, and Prince Philip, they knew full well that plans for a treaty were afoot, as there were treaties in New Zealand and also in Canada. But what did they do?" she asked rhetorically. 

"That's the source of the frustration."

Watch: Narelda Jacobs speaks about the Queen's death on Studio 10. Post continues below. 

Referring to a photo of her dad receiving an MBE [Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire] award from the Queen in 1981, Narelda said the picture symbolises, "that the Queen knew the struggles of First Nations people, she knew about the trauma that would have been experienced from colonisation".

"That [photo] symbolises to me, the sovereign, the Queen, the highest authority, and a man who... has been working tirelessly his whole life to have the sovereignty of his First Nations people recognised."

Narela Jacobs dad receiving the MBE from the Queen in June 1981. Image: Channel 10. 

Over 40 years on, Indigenous Australians are still calling for the establishment of a treaty with the government. 

"The source of frustration for First Nations people here in Australia is that, if they [the Queen and Prince Phillip] knew the trauma and intergenerational trauma, what more could they have said?"

"I know the monarchy is above politics but I think we would have liked there to be a little bit more over those 70 years of reign."

Despite this, she says there's no need to feel any anger. 

"That's not something we need to be angry about. It's not something that should be dismissed as saying, 'Get over it'.

"We need to come to terms with our history and really unite."

Narelda thinks the first step is a referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, which is expected to be held next year. 

"The Voice to Parliament needs to happen first before we talk about them becoming a republic. The Voice to Parliament is the first step, it's the easiest step in the Uluru Statement from the Heart. And it flows on [to] treaty processes which began in this country in the late 70s."

The establishment of a treaty will lead to practical change by finally recognising Indigenous Australians as sovereign people, she added. 

Read: 'I am an Aboriginal woman. Don't ask me to mourn the Queen's death.'

"There is no constitutional recognition of Indigenous people. So that's what treaty is all about, making agreement, making peace and that peace should have been done as soon as Captain Cook landed here, not firing the first shots and injuring people."

Moving forward, Narelda says it's important for people to keep an open mind and come together. 

"We can co-exist with the head of state of Australia, which doesn't have to be the monarch... We can have First Nations authority as well sitting side by side. Those things can exist and that would involve the Australian public having a very personal journey... to understand that history and say yes, I am happy for those things to coexist and for us to live in a world where we can be united and not divided."

Feature Image: Channel 10/Mamamia.

Can’t live without your phone or the internet? Take our survey now and you go in the running to win a $100 gift voucher!

TAKE SURVEY ➤

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

snorks 2 years ago
Obvious question, how will any of this help? 
Should be easy enough to see how it's worked in other countries. 

rush 2 years ago 2 upvotes
Genuine question - how much could the Queen have done about this situation? Could she have done more than have a strongly worded conversation with the PM?
chrissyinthemiddle 2 years ago 1 upvotes
@rush The Queen didn’t have the powers to do much more than that. It’s the Australian government who have the power to make the changes here. Narelda is right in saying the focus needs to be working towards a peaceful solution and the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum is a great first step. 
cat 2 years ago
@rush I don't see any reason why the Queen couldn't cede sovereignty of the country to First Nations people. 

Even publicly expressing support for a treaty would have changed everything. If she truly cared about it should could have stood next to Indigenous elders on every one of her tours of Australia and apologised for colonisation and recognised them as the true owners of the country. 

The options for things she could have done if she wanted to do something are pretty much endless. 
mb1111 2 years ago 2 upvotes
@cat consider the crisis that happened when she dismissed Whitlem which some argue was the start of the republican movement. Then try to imagine a situation where she would up the ante and cede Australia. I can’t. I think it was Noel Pearson who said Australia as we know it has 3 histories or words to that effect. This has resonated with me. In my opinion Australia was not hers to cede either.  The grave and heinous wrongs that have been done to indigenous Australians belong to the Australian people to resolve. Many indigenous Austalians also have a mixed race heritage. My mother in law has one side of her family that is indigenous and the other that she can trace back to a female convict ship..  My heritage is a first generation Australian. The Issues in modernAustrian are complex, divisive and are not something that some far off queen or king can magic away with a decree.  
cat 2 years ago
@mb1111 no one said she could magic it away, the point is she did literally nothing despite having huge legislative power and public influence at her disposal. 

And she didn't dismiss Whitlam, the Governor General did. Thats just another situation where she did nothing despite having the power to prevent a terrible injustice. 

You can either see her as a far-off queen with nothing to do with our issues or as a beloved public figure that Australia should spend days mourning, but you cant have it both ways.