“If I cannot have them, neither can he.”
Samira Lupidi loved her two daughters. She lived for them. She said, “they were my strength. “
And so when she had an argument with their father, in which she says he slapped her several times, she gathered them up and fled.
There are two contrasting descriptions of Samira Lupidi. Was she a young 24-year-old fleeing domestic violence or was she a violent monster who stabbed her two toddlers brutally – each nine times through their chest – after attempting to smother them and then admitting “If I can’t have them, he can’t have them either.”
Or is she both?
The 24-year-old mother, originally from Italy, has been found guilty of the murders of her two young daughters, Jasmine Weaver, 17 months and Evelyn Lupidi, aged 3 at a women’s refuge in West Yorkshire in the UK.
Guilty of violently stabbing them with a large kitchen knife after arguing with her former partner on the phone.
Jasmine Weaver, 17 months and Evelyn Lupidi, aged 3 were murdered by their mother. Via Facebook.
Lupidi had told officers that the girls' father - her partner, Carl Weaver, 31 – had slapped her twice the night before and she was scared he was going to kill her.
The two had met in Lupidi’s native Italy and had moved to the UK in 2013. The court heard Lupidi was alone and isolated and was prone to “jealousy” accusing Weaver of “seeing other women.”
Weaver said there were arguments and he “threw things” but never violence. The police officer who attended told the court Lupidi told them Mr Weaver was psychologically and financially controlling.
Top Comments
Nope, don't care if she was being bashed by her partner, killing her children like that is the act of a selfish POS.
She's in fear of her life, so she takes the life of her children? Sorry, that's not good enough. A slap in the face to all the women trying to protect their kids from violent men.
True but at least she got a good and fair sentence.
Most women who abuse their kids have been subjected to domestic violence, but most women who experience DV don't abuse their kids. It is one of those things where you have to take responsibility for your actions, unless of course you are suffering mental illness. Also, many women who are abused suffer head injuries which impede on their ability to make sound choices.
Yes, but I don't think that this is the case here. She did this to punish their father and she did it in a cruel, violent and bloody manner to make the impact of her crime on him all the more brutal.
Yes, the sentence is pretty fair. Probably could have done with a few more years.
I will agree, that it is better than you can hope for. But, these girls likely gave up what,60 or 70 years each? She should have to spend nothing less than what was taken from them. Or put her down. would be more cost effective. Dont bother saying "she should live to suffer for her decision." She doesn't give a shit or she wouldn't have killed all she should have lived for.
I've heard of fathers doing this, is the mother doing this a rare occurrence?
Father are the majority making up around 65%, with that being split basically in half between biological fathers and step-fathers.
Mothers make up the other 35%.
(AIC Homicidal Encounters)
With different motives. Many more men are known for killing with revenge as a motive, and women for killing out of a perception of "compassion," i.e.: the kids can't survive without them. This may be one of the reasons why the women aren't usually punished as severely as the men.
Yes, absolutely.
Though I can certainly argue that neither one is 'better'. The end result is the same.
But, as you say, the courts do take motivation into account.