It’s basically Christmas morning for nerds, people.
Yes. Tonight is census night, and the Australian Bureau of Statistics is billing it as our national moment to ‘pause’.
Woohoooo! It’s a non-violent, animal-cruelty-free race that will quietly stop the nation.
But, not everyone is celebrating.
Some people, people that a girlfriend of mine describes as “numpties with a Snowden complex” are planning to leave the name and address section of their census form blank, and a number still are planning to boycott the census altogether.
Post continues after video.
Why?
Because they don’t like the idea that the government will know the basic facts about you – your name, your age, your address, and a range of other important demographic indicators that will help plan for our nation’s future.
There are a number of things about this that I find somewhat baffling.
Let’s break them down.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics already collects your name and address data with your census information.
Yes, that’s right. In 2011, the last time we did this, you were asked to supply your name and address along with the rest of information you supplied with your census. In fact, as part the very first census in Australia in 1828, the people of NSW were asked to supply their name and address.
This is not a new request.
Critics, including the very vocal South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon, claim that this is an intrusion of privacy and a violation of human rights, which makes me cock my head to the side and quizzically remark, “Okkkaayyyyyyy.”
Other critics are concerned about the security of the data collected in the census, specifically that having name and address and demographic data directly linked may leave members of the community vulnerable to identity theft in the case of a data breach.
In case you were wondering, my head is still cocked to the side while I quizzically remark, “Okkkaaayyyyy.”
For two reasons. One, you can get enough detail to steal someone’s identity from a physical mailbox, or by hacking a Netflix account, or by simply looking at a Facebook profile in some cases.
And two, the government already has all of that data linked.
If you have a MyGov account (which is, by the way, the most frustratingly unusable piece of government infrastructure I have ever come across and please God, if you’re a member of the Turnbull Cabinet and you’re reading this FIX THAT FUCKER UP ALREADY) then you’ve probably already gone ahead and linked that information together yourself.
If you don’t have a MyGov account (congratulations, by the way, on avoiding it and good luck for your future) then let me reassure you (yes REASSURE you, because this is a good thing) that there are inter-departmental agreements in place that allow for the transfer of your information across government agencies.
For example, if you’re not enrolled to vote, the government can cross match a bunch of data from agencies like the tax office, Centrelink and Medicare, work out who you are, how old you are and where you live and then automatically enrol you to vote.
You can’t escape it. And nor should you want to, if only for the sake of efficiency.
Seriously, unless you don’t have a Medicare card, a tax file number or you’ve never applied for Centrelink, if you’ve never been to school or university and never had a job, the government already knows your name, your address, your age and any of the other details about your life that you seem to think are pretty juicy.
In other words, shut up about the damn census.
Fill your form in, enjoy your part of the national ‘pause’ and stop ruining my nerd Christmas.
Top Comments
So the website is back up - for now. But the problem will be the veracity of any data added from today. Will it accurately reflect the state of the nation on one evening in August, 2016, as it is meant to do (and as it will likely claim to do)?
That mate who was at your place when you filled in your form, including his details, is now home with his wife, who never got to lodge her form. His car is also now parked in a different location and his daily duties differ. So his wife lodges her form tonight, or tomorrow, or sometime before September 23, and puts his details on her form too - because he's there now.
What about people who were in the country on Tuesday but are now on a world trip and not due back before October? Will their details ever be captured? And what about people who weren't here but are here now and may think they have to fill out the online form, because they can?
The data will be a shambles.
What will it now cost to employ the necessary resources to cross-check and remove redundant data, duplicate data and other errors caused by this farce? And will the final data be any more trustworthy? One assumes the confidence interval will be necessarily low and the margin of error high.
This 2016 Census should be abandoned and all existing data destroyed. The ABS reputation is already in question after years of cutbacks and data screw ups, they don't really need this added to the pile.
Hmmm, in hindsight, how is that "pause" looking?