OK. Guys.
I know this is literally so last week. But we need to talk about the Census again.
So, let us put down our Bachie recaps for a moment, let us leave our talk of Roxy Jacenko’s upcoming 60 Minutes interview and our discussion about the fact that Bec Judd is constantly body shamed. Just for a moment. OK, well, just for 20 minutes.
You definitely are might be aware there were a few issues on ‘Census night’ last Tuesday. A couple of wee ‘denial of service’ attacks. Nothing major.
I’m not joking. DDoS attacks happen all the time. In 2013, according to EWeek, IT security outfit NSFOCUS compiled some data that shows there are 28 DDoS attacks every hour. There’s some stuff floating around the Internet that suggests DDoS attacks are up in 2016, but, er, I didn’t really understand what these guys and these guys were saying and I ran out of time to call my network engineer husband to get him to explain it.
Listen: The Mamamia Out Loud podcast discusses #CensusFail 2016. (Post continues after audio.)
Top Comments
August 9, 2016 has eclipsed the winter solstice as the longest night of the year.
Why do people have such a big problem with filling out the Census all of a sudden? Did you feel the same way about the last one, or is it just popular now to mistrust the government? Obviously, there have been issues with the online one - they clearly were not prepared - but all the conspiracy theories are just ridiculous. Worried about giving out your name and address together? Don't receive mail, because it's printed on the front of that. Uncomfortable about telling the government about your job? Don't fill out your tax returns (and risk another fine). Uncomfortable about providing the data you've provided to internet companies over and over? Don't use any form of social media - in fact, go live off the grid where you won't be forced to use any of the public conveniences (roads, schools, hospitals, etc.) that are designed off the back of information like this.
Why?
Because the ex-boss of the Australian Bureau of Statistics described the new policy of keeping names and linking them to other datasets as the "most significant
invasion of privacy ever perpetrated" (by the bureau of statistics).
Names never used to be compulsory. Now, for reasons not explained, they are compulsory. Data used to be disposed of, now it won't be. And now, your details will result in what amounts to a central ID number that can be used to (possibly?) cross-reference all your govt data.
Add to this that current ABS chief told a Senate inquiry "There is a lot of, perhaps, misinformation about the value of census... There is a sense in the community that a lot of the information is derived from the census, which is just not true." - and you wonder why we're doing this at all.
It seems the most useful thing the Census provides is population numbers used to determine electoral boundaries. They don't need names for that.
The government already has your name and address together, in several forms. But government departments can't share data easily. Names are required to establish relationships between respondents more easily (it can be difficult when you've got cultural groups who have different naming systems), and also to make it easier for people to remember which part of the form they're filling out (it asks you things like, "Where was XX on Tuesday, August 9?").
And the data will be destroyed, just later than usual(four years now, instead of the past 18 months). Again, it's data you've provided to the government before, and probably less data than you provide to social media platforms everyday without even thinking about it.
The Census is also used to plan for education, healthcare, employment, transport, etc.
I don't do Facebook or Twitter or Instagram. I don't even use my name or email address here.
As for the planning, read again what the current ABS boss told a Senate inquiry. The census is largely irrelevant.
I should correct one error. Names have been required for many years. What's different this time is using name and address details to create a personal ID which will not be destroyed after four years (which is just one year before the next census will collect all those details again).
Beyond that, this Census is dead in the water. It is supposed to be a national snapshot of one evening. It is no longer any such thing. People who were in the country on August 9 are now overseas - or dead. Others who were overseas are now back and living with people filling out their census late. Others have been born.
But they're still asked: where were you on August 9? Not where they are right now. People being born or dying isn't relevant, because the Census is about what the country looked like on August 9. I agree that with the computer system stuff-up, it probably won't be very accurate now.