In 2018, Scarlett Johansson was named as the highest-paid actress in Hollywood.
In the last year alone, the actress has raked in $40.5 million – largely thanks to her role as Black Widow in Marvel’s Avengers films.
But over the course of the last five years, the actress has also stood out as one of Hollywood’s most controversial figures.
Scarlett Johansson speaks to Mamamia about female friendships. Post continues after video.
Through the constant hate, Twitter memes and controversy, however, Johansson has proven herself to be the movie star most adept at seamlessly moving in and out of controversy.
But no matter how smoothly she appears to sail through the criticism, Scarlett Johansson keeps on making the same mistake.
In 2017, the actress was subject to widespread accusations of whitewashing when she took on the lead role of Major in 2017’s live action adaptation of the manga series Ghost in the Shell, which was directed by Rupert Sanders.
Since the character Johansson was playing was Japanese in the source material, she received fierce backlash for taking on a role that could have instead gone to an Asian actor.
Top Comments
They are actors, they act. It's their job.
With this criteria of fitting the bill no-one is going to see the awesome achievements of Stephen Hawking if they ever decided to make a film about him.
Good lord, they already did. Eddie Redmayne won an Oscar for it in 2015.
At least google before you make ridiculous comments.
That was not really my point.
Eddie Redmayne is a model and no doubt a great actor (hence the Oscar award) - however, according to the criteria from the author he should never have played the role since he has no direct experience of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Where do we draw the line on what role an actor can play without the backlash 'outrage' and 'mistakes' as mentioned in the article?
LOL you really missed the point on that one.
Does Eddie have amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?
It’s not really hard. We draw the line before we award more able bodied, privileged actors from representing the lives of people with a disability. So yes, no more actors playing their ‘Oscar role’ of Neurodiverse/transgender/physically disabled person.
Instead, producers might have to work a little harder to find someone who isn’t an A list star to fill the role. ‘What if they can’t act’, I can hear you cry. Having been to drama school I can confirm that for every Oscar winner out there there are literally thousands of other actors that are just as good, if not better (certainly better than Scarlett). There will be even more when drama schools stop factoring in which applicants they can ‘sell to the industry’ i.e. have the right combo of looks and background. And, shock and horror, we might end up with some diverse movie stars!!
Good thing there’s a whole system of millions of talent agents worldwide that could be doing exactly this at any moment.
These comments are a nightmare
Because people disagree with you?
I don't know Cat, the rise of the right is happening all over the world, they are galvanised and working together. Meanwhile, the left are bickering about silly little things that will be completely insignificant if we don't also present a strong united front. I was having a conversation with friends on the weekend, there were 6 of us. All left wingers, one has completely given up the cause because of a the identity politics stuff, literally wants no associatian with it at all. The other four are outraged that we can't get out act together. I'm beginning to see their point to be honest. You've got to wonder where it is going wrong if life long died in the wool lefties are turning away. What are your thoughts?
Why exactly are they a 'nightmare'?
What's the criteria being used here, I honestly do not understand.
Side Note: Are political affiliations like left and right appropriate for the entertainment industry?
A movie is just a movie after all. The imagination, the immersion, the experience are the key factors - or do I have this wrong?