Waleed Aly once again proves he might just be the smartest man on television.
If you’re having trouble grasping the political implications of the Syrian crisis, you’re not alone. A complex issue has just been complicated even further as Russia launched an airstrike into Syria through Iraqi and Iranian airspace.
It’s an international, internal, and external conflict all rolled into one, and it is confusing.
But thanks to Waleed Aly on last night’s episode of The Project, you may have a greater chance of wrapping your head around it.
When Carrie asks the question, ‘What the hell is going on over there?’ Peter Heliar’s reaction sums up the reaction of many. A moment’s hesitation and the realisation that actually… we’re not really sure.
Enter Waleed, who eloquently and succinctly explains the current political implications of what’s going on in Syria.
In less than 20 seconds.
No talking in circles and no complex terminology. Just further proof that he should probably be Australia’s next PM.
“This is a war with three sides,” says Waleed.
“Essentially, there are three major players in Syria at the moment: There is President Assad and his forces, and the rebels trying to overthrow the current regime. And then there is Islamic State who as Waleed puts it, “are just trying to screw everyone.”
As to Russia’s recent airstrike, it is perhaps less about terrorism that President Putin would have the public think. Waleed suggests Russia’s current involvement in Syria is strategic, as they have a long standing alliance with Syria.
Top Comments
I was so upset about how Waleed try to simplify a very confusing and twisted conflict. I guess that's what happens when entertainers try to explain conflicts.
I could be wrong but I thought the rebels were essentially IS Sympathisers? The Assad family are Sunni Muslims and the Arab spring uprisers are Shia Muslims who the west supported against the Assad regime not too long ago.
My understanding is that Muslims of the same sect will support each other so IS is supported by most Shia muslims (Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood etc).
So the people fleeing from my understanding are non muslim and Sunni's.
I thought this is reason Palestine was split into two, so two sects of Islam Sunni (Fatah) and Shia (Hamas) could exist with Israel as the buffer zone.
I also believe the minor conflicts in Lebanon to this day are between voths sects.
I think Waleed is not focusing on all the background influence that supports the two sides.
The third side are non Muslims trying to keep out of it.
I mean I could be wrong but the Arab spring uprising wasn't a bloody coincidence!
Asad is Shia. The rebels are mainly Sunni. IS is a perverted version of Sunni. IS cares more about their own power than religion.