Last night’s show could’ve been titled “Q&A: The ‘Barnaby Joyce says controversial things’ edition.”
Tonight’s Q&A panel featured Shadow Health Minister Catherine King, Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce, journalist David Marr, Museum of Contemporary Art director Elizabeth Ann Macgregor and Institute of Public Affairs boss John Roskam.
It was a recipe for fiery debates about a wide range of issues including abortion access and domestic violence — and Mr Joyce, in particular, made a few eyebrow-raising comments throughout the episode.
Here are the key moments you’ll need to know about from last night’s show.
1. Barnaby Joyce said abortion access shouldn’t be discussed on Q&A.
When an audience member asked the panel why abortion is still criminalised in several Australian states and territories — and when we can expect to see some changes — Nationals senator Mr Joyce fumbled his way through a vague, tangental answer.
“My view is that a life is to be respected wither its within the womb or outside the womb. It’s based on me going back through my life and saying, when did I attain the rights that I had now? At what point did that happen?” he said.
Host Tony Jones pressed Mr Joyce to answer the actual question and the Agriculture Minister responded: “Well I’ve really said what view is. My view is, At what point in my life did someone had the right to point… therefore I don’t agree with abortion.”
Jones pressed further: “Nor that women should have any right to choose what happens with their own body?”
Top Comments
Barnaby Joyce was completely shot down by Catherine King & David Marr. It was brilliant to watch. He came across as a typical conservative, middle-aged white man with grossly outdated views on abortion. King and Marr both agreed that abortion shouldn't be a criminal offence for women to pursue, whereas Joyce couldn't state the same. I was extremely impressed by Catherine King and David Marr was, as always, perfectly eloquent.
Outdated views??? What a stupid way to describe the views of a person who places value on the life of an unborn child. They are anything but outdated and are just as relevant as your views on the subject.
What about placing value on the life of the woman? A fetus is "potential" life, the woman is "alive" right here and right now. Why would someone who values life not see that? Do you not think that it's outdated to insist on controlling women's reproductive life in the 21st century?
First up fetus, children are born
Second, you think abortion should be a criminal offence?
A womans life has value too and she is more than a mere vessel for a fetus
My person views differ from Joyce's; a lot. However, what he communicated to me is that he didn't want to 'cut short' the abortion debate by a Q & A that deals with a lot of issues. The headline is misleading and part of the problem with journalism. Joyce went on to say "It could occupy a whole discussion piece (hour long Q&A) itself."
....Maybe Joyce's position is an extension of the Turnbull Governments stated movement away from 'slogan politics'; maybe it is because Joyce's views are not popular and he doesn't like talking about an issue where his position will probably be judged poorly by history ..... The Turnbull Government took the first small step towards acknowledging that domestic violence is an extension of a broader patriarchal society that does not value women enough. Domestic violence is a gender issue and it is finally being treated as one. Since then Turnbull has been criticised for saying 'real men' and Joyce saying domestic violence is part of an issue society has for a lack of respect for women. I am not for a minute saying that we should let people get away with any 'ism' because they made a small effort; but this has been a substantial shift. I saw this on Clementine Ford's FB page and thought it was apt. "We need to put our faith and our energy into showing each other how to do things right, rather than punishing each other for getting it wrong".http://everydayfeminism.com/.../so...