Australian women have been left waiting for 150 days now for a Sex Discrimination Commissioner.
In that time, we’ve seen rampant, high-profile cases of sexism, including from Turnbull Government ministers, which a Sex Discrimination Commissioner could have spoken out about.
Perhaps that’s why the Government is dragging its heels on making the appointment. It’s unacceptable to leave this important role vacant for months on end and the majority of Senators agree with me.
Yesterday afternoon, the Senate passed my motion calling on the Government to get on with the appointment of Australia’s official advocate for women against discrimination.
The former Commissioner, Elizabeth Broderick, was a strong voice for women, who fearlessly called out sexism, and thankfully continues to do so unofficially. Her original term was extended for a fixed timeframe so the government had plenty of notice to find a replacement. Elizabeth Broderick has left big shoes to fill. She has convinced big businesses to take gender equality seriously; advocated for paid parental leave before we had any; raised awareness about domestic violence when it was taboo and led an investigation into how women are treated in the defence force after the Skype scandal. It’s an outstanding legacy and one that many worthy women could carry on admirably.
So why is it taking so long? My worst fear is that the government thinks we might all forget about the position and then they might try and remove it like they did for the Disability Discrimination Commissioner. So it was good news that the Senate passed my motion, sending an official message to the government that we’re watching and waiting, along with many, many more women in the community.
Top Comments
This is ridiculous! I'm sure most of us would happily fill this role for free, as of right now,...get on with it Government!!!
get rid of it government. Waste of hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars.
Get rid of this position you mean? That would be very short-sighted as the macro-economic benefits if gender equality is achieved exponentially outweighs the salary and costs associated with this role.
Does having this role filled help achieve gender equality?
Have things gone backwards in the last 6 months?
There is no macro economic benefit to replacing men with women or women with men.
There are already state and local anti discrimination bodies, pick a leader from one of them if you must have the distraction and shut the rest down.
women have been waiting? What about the men? Oh yeah, this is another one of those equality things for women only.
'the Senate passed my motion calling on the Government to get on with the appointment of Australia’s official advocate for women against discrimination' - doesn't exactly seem open to helping all genders.
But you know it's impossible to discriminate against a man according to the sexist rent seekers.
let me guess - you're one of the people who complains that the Race Discrimination Commissioner doesn't do enough for white people?
We have a commissioner to support men's rights, it's called the Sex Discrimination Commissioner. They are there to support the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 which is not about women, but to prevent discrimination based on sex, marital status, etc.
The fact that the current position of Sex Discrimination Commissioner is seen only to benefit women is a bit of a worry.