I don’t mean “Nazis” in the abstract racist sense. I mean actual, genuine, swastika bearing white supremacists, proudly shouting Nazi slogans. They’re not even wearing hoods. They are out in the open, wearing baseball hats that say “make America great again.”
They are angry, they are racist, and they are so emboldened by the current president (who they voted for and whose election they see as a direct validation of their xenophobic principles) that they are marching with assault rifles in broad daylight.
It’s chilling. We’ve seen this before. It was a major theme of World War Two, and it is a scarily similar scenario to what Margaret Atwood imagined led to the establishment in the US of the theocratic regime Gilead in The Handmaid’s Tale. We just got a glimpse into the birth of what was supposed to be dystopian, post apocalyptic fiction.
But this is not fiction. This is a real thing.
The marches on Saturday came after a prelude on Friday night, when hundreds of the “Alt Right” took literal flaming torches to a university campus. They clearly had a lot of aggression to deal with, and it quickly erupted into violence.
How did it come to this? It’s a long story. Racial tension has always been a major issue in American politics and society, right from the beginning. They fought a civil war. The slavers lost. In many cities in the south, statues commemorating the generals who fought for oppression stand in public parks. This is clearly pretty offensive to the descendants of those slaves who live there now, and who still find themselves facing systematic oppression and institutionalised racism in the form of police violence. To look at someone who fought a war to keep your ancestors as slaves, and to know that they hold a cherished and respected position in your town, while your friends are being shot to death by the police who are meant to protect them, on a near daily basis, is a bitter pill. 2,145 people have been shot and killed by police since Jan. 1, 2015.
Top Comments
'White men are opposed to “political correctness”, because they are used to getting their way all of the time, and they hate the fact that that’s changing.' - Are we? All of us? I better get started then.
Politics are getting more adversarial, more us vs them and more about identity politics and this sort of thing will only get worse.
When you intentially treat one group better (race/gender/whatever) you are by default treating other group(s) worse. This will of course upset said groups whether they have cause to be or not.
The focus should always be on treating all people the same.
Aye, comrade ;)
I agree with the idea in theory but I can never see it working in real life.
People will find differences, perceived or actual, and make huge deals about them.
I can understand the uninentional bias but when people make a concious decision to discrimate even wtih good intentions there will always be follow on affects.
I agree. Unintentional bias is, unfortunately, unavoidable.
Certainly in politics they should concentrate on treating everyone the same (with the obvious exceptions of e.g. disabled people who need extra help, that sort of thing).