If there is one policy that perfectly reflects the massive disappointment many people feel towards the Abbott-Turnbull Government, it’s the saga over paid parental leave.
In the space of a few short years, they’ve gone from promising wealthy women $75,000 to promising cuts of more than $11,000 to women on below average incomes.
It’s enough to give you whiplash.
As with all great sagas, it’s easier to start at the beginning.
In 2011, I introduced Australia’s first national paid parental leave scheme. For the first time, working women in Australia would get financial support from the government to take some time off work to care for their newborn baby.
Jenny Macklin MP.
Labor’s paid parental leave scheme provides women with 18 weeks of paid leave at the minimum wage – that’s about $11,800 in total.
It isn’t extravagant, but it isn’t meant to be. It targets assistance to parents on low and middle incomes, many of whom previously weren’t getting any paid parental leave from their employers.
It’s also designed so that paid parental leave can be topped up by employers who want to add to the government’s modest scheme. This means new mums can combine their leave entitlements and spend more time at home in those critical early months of a child’s life.
After previously saying a Coalition government would support paid parental leave over his “dead body”, Tony Abbott made one of his famous captain’s calls and promised a scheme that was completely over the top, offering $75,000 to very wealthy women.
Top Comments
I am so grateful for the Labor PPL scheme. I was able to access 12 weeks paid leave from my employer and then 18 weeks from the Government. This meant I could stay home with my son for substantially longer than I could have otherwise. I wholeheartedly support the Labor PPL scheme, and wish Liberal would leave it alone. Sometimes good policies should be left untouched!
I'm not particularly for paid parental leave, but I ma darn sick of this (and other) governments dismantling costly programs. !/ It costs us, the ratepayers, heaps for the stupid changes; and 2/ It messes with ordinary people's plans and expectations so much.
Try tackling the big end of town! A small increase for them will allow ordinary Aussies to live in some peace.
Tax payers, not ratepayers.
I don't mean to pick you up for a simple misuse of the word, it's just that I work in finance in local government and the term 'Ratepayers' gives me nightmares ;)
Thanks. I meant taxpayers, of course.