When describing the narcissism of Donald Trump, Dr John Gartner compares him to a malignant tumour.
Because Trump, like many politicians, is a narcissist, according to psychologists. But they also believe he is a malignant narcissist, and that is so much worse.
Dr Gartner is a US psychologist and one of the contributors to 2017 book The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, which contains essays from 27 psychologists, psychiatrists, and mental health professionals on the “clear and present danger” that US President Donald Trump’s mental health poses to the “nation and individual well being”.
Listen to Mamamia’s daily news podcast The Quicky on Donald Trump and narcissism. Post continues after audio.
He is also the president of Duty To Warn, an association of mental health professionals who believe Trump is psychologically unfit for office.
Consequently, these professionals have deviated from the American Psychiatric Association’s Goldwater rule, which holds that it is unethical for psychiatrists to give professional opinions about public figures without examining them in person.
Speaking to Mamamia‘s daily news podcast The Quicky, Dr Gartner explained that the experts believe that in the case of Trump, their duty to warn – where they can break confidentially if there is a clear danger to a person – is greater than the Goldwater rule.
Top Comments
There should be mandatory psych assessments carried out by the UN on potential leadership candidates. We have seen throughout history the same kinds of dangerous despot leaders be given power, with devastating consequences. When will we learn how to recognise these damaged men before they get anywhere near any position of power? (Or...just get more women in power!)
Cool, so the Russian collusion narrative failed so comprehensively now we're back on the Trump's dangerous mental health narrative, as usual, 'diagnosed' by someone who has never met Trump.
While he may not have been actually found guilty of collusion, it has been proven that Russia did indeed intefere with the election to get Trump in. And some of his inner circle has been found guilty of that. My question is why? What has Russia got to gain by that? Also, why does it not seem to bother Trump supporters re Russian inteference in so called democratic election?
Ever heard of The Clinton's and Uranium One
I haven't I'll look it up though, any thoughts on Russia's inteference on the election?
Russia has been spying on and meddling in American affairs since the Cold War. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Robert Hanssen, Aldrich Ames. Russia probably wanted a President they might have influence with, the same goes for the Clinton foundation. Foreign benefactors did not donate millions of dollars to it out of altruism, but in the hope were she elected Presidentof having 'a friend' in the White House. Once she lost the election, the donations dried up as quickly as the Murray Darling River (but not the NSW part of course)