opinion

'I'm an Indigenous Elder. Here's what I want the undecided to know about the Voice.'

Nungamanladi! That's 'hello' in Bardi language. 

Are you perhaps feeling a bit overwhelmed by the Voice debate right now? You're definitely not the only one.

Aunty Munya Andrews is an Aboriginal Elder, author and barrister. She is also co-director of Evolve Communities, a trusted authority for Indigenous Cultural Awareness and Ally Training.

For years Aunty Munya has been working towards making this country a more inclusive place through allyship and education – and voting in the referendum, she explains, is simply about recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in our constitution through an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

"Unfortunately this issue of the Voice has become very political. But this is a safe space – no guilt, no blame and no shame," she tells Mamamia

Watch: Anthony Albanese speaking about the referendum. Post continues below.

To help dispel some of the misconceptions around the Voice in a judgement-free manner, Aunty Munya is here to answer some commonly asked questions and help you make a decision that aligns with your values. 

'Where did the Voice come from?'

The plan and vision of the Voice comes directly from the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

For reference, the Uluru Statement from the Heart is the most comprehensive consultation of First Nations people that Australia has ever seen. Twelve Regional Dialogues were held across Australia throughout 2016-2017, during which more than 1,200 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people came together to deliberate and think about which reforms would have the most impact in their communities.

"I really recommend people watch this video from the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which provides some additional background. It's very moving," says Aunty Munya. 

'I'm confused about what a Yes vote would actually mean. Can you explain?'

Sure! The Voice will... 

  • give independent advice to the Parliament and Government.
  • be chosen by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people based on the wishes of local communities.
  • be representative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, gender balanced and include youth.
  • be empowering, community-led, inclusive, respectful and culturally informed.
  • be accountable and transparent.
  • work alongside existing organisations and traditional structures.
  • not have a veto power.
  • not have a program delivery function.

"If you are still feeling a bit confused, this is a brilliant [TikTok] video below that does lots of explaining."

@wilstracke Why are First Nations Peoples so insistent that the Voice needs to be enshrined in the constitution? #voicetoparliament #ulurustatement #voteyes #fromtheheart ♬ original sound - Wil Stracke

'If I vote no, does that make me a racist?' 

"If you do vote no, it doesn't have a meaning that you are racist – if you feel you have valid reasons for voting no," says Aunty Munya. "We just ask people to do the research and educate themselves about it.

"The 'No' vote campaign typically relies on arguments that the Voice is legally risky, unknown, divisive and that there's not enough detail. Legal experts, however, have noted that the Voice is not legally risky, which disbands that claim."

'What are the Yes campaign's main arguments?'

The most common arguments for voting yes include that the Voice will provide recognition and be representative of First Nations people.

It also aims to provide an opportunity for listening, achieving better results and being a permanent avenue for Indigenous people having their perspectives heard and acknowledged.

More than 80 per cent of Aboriginal people are supportive of the Voice. This has been fact-checked

"For me, the Voice is a start and I'm very supportive. I look at what we've got now, and there's still a gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians," Aunty Munya tells Mamamia.

"The gap is not closing. This is a proposal to try another way to close the gap. So for me, it is important to at least try and give it a shot. Otherwise we can go back to the drawing board. But this is a positive step forward, and one that would be enshrined in the constitution. It's a step in the right direction."

'Why don't all Aboriginal people agree on the Voice?'

Aboriginal people are like any other people in the world – they have a diverse range of opinions. The same goes for the Voice and the referendum.

"When we look at the Indigenous map of Australia, it shows how diverse and far-reaching Aboriginal Australia is."

However, as mentioned, the majority of Indigenous people have expressed support for a Voice to Parliament. 

'Is it possible to talk about the Voice respectfully with others?'

"It is a hard yarn talking about the Voice. Truth-telling is a hard yarn, and our approach is hoping these conversations eventually become easier," says Aunty Munya.

But for genuine, thoughtful conversations about the Voice, there's a three-step approach we can take:

1. Reflect: Pause and identify what's at the heart of the issue. 

2. Relate: Try to imagine how the other person might be feeling. 

3. Reconcile: Work with the other person towards a solution. 

"We want to step away from shame and blame, as it just gets in the way of achieving reconciliation. We want to move forward together. We just ask everyone to bear it in mind how this issue is impacting Indigenous people right now. It is a difficult time," she notes.

"Vote with your own conscience. As we like to say in my Bardi language 'Inyidigal Gorna' (Go Well)."

For more from Aunty Munya Andrews, you can follow Evolve Communities' website hereInstagram, and see their books here

Feature Image: Supplied.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

shauna020473 a year ago 4 upvotes
I am humbled by the grace of so many first nations people in Australia who put aside past wrongs and come together to find modest solutions to the economic and social consequences of generations of denial even of their citizenship, identity, family, language and culture. ie even today, there was an article about the torture of stolen generation first nations boys in Kinchela boy's home as recently as the 70s.

The VTP seems like the least we could do, but more than that, it could enrich us all. Over the past few years we seem to be finally waking up to how unique and special it is that we have the oldest surviving culture on earth.
missmc a year ago
@shauna020473 totally agree. 

zaky a year ago 1 upvotes
Of course, all the people who plan to vote No are not racist, many are well intentioned people confused by the conflicting claims, misdirection and lies about the proposed changes.  However ,I do not know a single person who claims that the aborigines "have it too good" or "are more privileged than them " who is planning to vote YES.  So although most people think they are not racists they do get on the same bandwagon with the racists. 
snorks a year ago 6 upvotes
@zaky Not confused, not racist, just don't think it's a good idea. 
All those people who are voting yes are treating people differently on the basis of their race, the very definition of racism. 
gigi2 a year ago 7 upvotes
Hello again @snorks :)
The wariness I’ve sensed from many voices about a VTP includes:
i) it’s not fair to single out a race for extra privilege
ii) it won’t work, so will waste taxpayer funds
iii) there’s not enough detail to know what we’re voting on
iv) it could be used to vexatiously slow down any legislation
v) it will be divisive
vi) it doesn’t go far enough because it lacks power
vii) it could backfire in a way that we can’t see yet
viii) if it can be done now via legislation why have a referendum?
Reminds me of the cognitive dissonance scene in the Barbie movie :)
It’s normal for any of us to be wary of change when people we might not trust propose it. It’s normal to be on guard about protecting our interests if it looks like ‘those others’ don’t care about our concerns.
Out of the list above, fairness seems to be pretty important to a lot of Australians.
Yet our nation already accepts a kind of ‘unfairness’ in divvying up the federal budget. When the largest single chunk of the budget is social security and welfare, it already shows a bias towards those needing support. So, perhaps an uneven distribution of money is not what’s really driving a belief that it’s unfair.
What about power? We already know that an advisory body doesn’t get any more voting rights than anyone else and it’s only Parliament that can legislate the details. So, it may not be about power either.
Is it about influence? There are many ways to influence legislation, and they variously need money. Those who have it can influence more, like powerful lobby groups. Perhaps there’s a belief that this ‘fair’ influencing system needs constitutional protection against an ‘unfair’ FN VTP?
Is the root of it about status? A belief that it’s deeply unfair if second nationers have to move over to let FNs stand tall again, as they had for 60,000+ years before second nationers took over, using what we would now call crimes against humanity which left intergenerational trauma in their wake. For me, our acceptance of a VTP says we have now learned to genuinely value FNs’ unique status in this ancient land, to the point where we change our relatively young constitution to permanently protect FNs voice to our country’s power structure.
After all they’ve suffered at the hands of second nationers, seems only fair to me.
snorks a year ago 2 upvotes
@gigi2 I haven't seen the Barbie movie yet, it's on my list for this weekend :)

I'm not seeing any cognitive dissonance though. You've seen all those arguments, I'm sure, but from different people (hopefully). 

Your arguments is that we are already unfair, so being more unfair is okay?

What other advisory body would be enshrined in the constitution? A guarantee of that nature is definitely a power no one else has. 

Status? No, no issues with status. 

Have you considered that we shouldn't do it just because it's not going to help anything? And we have examples of where we've tried very similar things?
zaky a year ago 7 upvotes
@gigi2 thank you for your eloquent and compassionate response.  After reading comments like yours I cannot comprehend why would someone consider voting against the inclusion of of the Voice in our Constitution.  It will be an improvement that will benefit all Australians and might even bridge the gap between Indigenous (or First Nation Australians) and the rest of us Second Nationers.