Just after 11am on Wednesday morning, Cardinal George Pell was sentenced to six years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of three years and eight months.
Pell’s sentencing for sexually abusing two choirboys in 1996 was broadcast Australia-wide.
The maximum penalty for Pell’s crimes was 10 years, yet Chief Justice Peter Kidd said this was “not the diminutive factor of my sentence, nor is the maximum penalty the starting point for my sentencing exercise”.
Chief Judge Peter Kidd said Pell’s age – as a 77-year-old – was a factor in his sentencing.
“Of some real importance in my sentencing exercise is the fact that each year you spend in custody will represent a substantial portion of your remaining life expectancy,” he said.
“I am conscious that the term of imprisonment, which I am about to impose upon you, carries with it a real, as distinct from theoretical, possibility that you may not live to be released from prison.
“Facing jail at your age in these circumstances must be an awful state of affairs for you. You are also clearly someone with some significant enough health issues.
Listen to Mia Freedman, Holly Wainwright & Jessie Stephens unpack the Pell verdict on Mamamia Out Loud… Post continues after audio.
“I have no doubt that you will experience some stress while in custody. I will make allowance for these matters.”
The character references provided for Pell were also taken into account.
“In addition to not having any prior convictions, I am satisfied that the evidence before me is that you are someone who has been, in the last 22 years, since the offending, of otherwise good character.
“I sentence you upon the basis that these episodes, viewed together, constitute isolated offending. I make substantial allowance for your good character and otherwise blameless life.”
A disgraced Pell has spent two-weeks behind bars, after being found guilty by a jury in December of five child sex offences. He was initially bailed so he could get knee surgery in Sydney.
Pell is the highest ranking Catholic to be convicted of child sexual abuse, and due to the global interest in the case the court has allowed cameras inside for Chief Judge Peter Kidd’s remarks. However the camera will only show Judge Kidd, not Pell.
The maximum jail term for his crimes is 10 years.
Pell abused the two 13-year-old boys after a Sunday mass in 1996, after being installed as the Archbishop of Melbourne.
The friends had snuck away to drink holy wine in the sacristy when they were ‘caught’ by Pell who assaulted them. One of the boys was molested for a second time a month later against a wall in a cathedral corridor.
During the trial, the defence barrister Robert Richter QC tried to downplay the conduct as “no more than a plain, vanilla sexual penetration case”.
He later apologised for those remarks, after Judge Kidd rejected the statement describing Pell’s behaviour as “callous, brazen and blatant”.
One of the boys died in 2014, and it was his death that encouraged the friend to come forward with the allegations. His testimony, over two and a half days, is said to have been so strong it led to the jury’s unanimous decision. The public hasn’t heard his testimony in full.
The public only learnt of the case against Pell on February 26, after suppression orders gagged the media from reporting on it.
Pell continues to deny all of the allegations and has filed an appeal against his conviction. He didn’t testify in court. But Judge Kidd was given 10 character references, including from former Prime Minister John Howard.
Huge crowds are expected to gather outside the county court this morning, but they’re unlikely to get a glimpse of Pell. The courtroom is expected to be packed with abuse survivors who have their own interest in the result, beyond that of Pell’s surviving victim, now aged in his 30s.
Senior crown prosecutor Mark Gibson SC foreshadowed in a pre-sentence hearing that Pell would spend “significant time” in prison, including likely long periods in lockdown because of his high profile.
Pell’s application for leave is being heard on June 5.
For more on this topic:
“He was a different boy”. The family of one of George Pell’s victims share their heartbreak.
George Pell is not what a Catholic looks like.
What George Pell’s defenders cannot possibly know about his victim.
The telling words George Pell uttered 16 years ago that shocked members of his own church.
“He was practically shouting.” Exactly how George Pell tried to ‘prove’ his innocence in court.
Top Comments
I think the only way Pell would show any emotion would be if he was excommunicated from his beloved church. May his appeal fail and he continue to rot in jail.
“Otherwise good character”, really? ‘Yeah, he’s a great guy, if you ignore the paedophilia’. And frankly I wouldn’t be putting too much emphasis on the ‘no prior convictions’ part either. Does anyone actually think these two boys were the only ones he abused? (I know that possible crimes shouldn’t be considered during sentencing, I’m just saying maybe don’t emphasise that as part of your reasoning.)