Content note: This post has graphic descriptions of verbal, emotional, and physical domestic abuse, and may be distressing for some readers.
I’ve come to the conclusion that maybe it’s not that I can’t see men as victims — maybe it’s that I don’t want to see my stepdad as having been one himself, before he was an abuser.
“You’re crazy. Stop hitting me. I’m bleeding! Help, help! Someone call the police. Please help me!”
These were the muffled screams I heard the night I called the police on my neighbour.
In less than 10 minutes, a gang of six officers were huddled at her door, demanding to be let in. As I watched, through my peephole, I waited for the moment they’d pull her, swollen and bloody into the hallway.
But that never happened.
It wasn’t my neighbour who was bleeding and in need of protection — it was her boyfriend.
Before they cuffed my neighbour and sealed her up in the blinking cop car outside our building, one of the female officers pulled the boyfriend out into the hallway. I held my breath as I balanced on my toes, and pressed my ear against the door.
Top Comments
This is the most confused article I have read in a while. If it was to explain how an abused child can repeat acts of violence, it failed. If it was to perpetuate the one-eyed view that men are ignored victims of domestic violence, again it failed. I could detail my response however there is no point. Until we see all men as victims, all women as offenders, then these small-minded men won't stop. The telling moments are when the author refuses to speak about male on male dev, which is a significant factor. Or dad on son abuse. Nope..... Just women offenders.
You don't see the hypocrisy in saying that men won't stop until they see all women as abusers while the vast majority of the stories only see women as the abusers?
I've never met a man who thinks that women do all the abusing.
And I've never seen anyone on this site say that either.
The problem is that it's not comparable not even a tad bit. So don't make out what women go through is the same to what men go through because women are dying and you don't care. That makes you a horrible person.
Once a cop told me that if men were not around there would hardly be any crime committed, especially not violent crime.
How it is not comparable?
Men don't die as much, no question there. Other than that it's pretty much the same.
So, me wanting all victims to be recognised makes me a horrible person. What does that make people who say that 1/3 of the victims even exist?
And i've spoken to cops who say that in cases of DV they always arrest the male, no matter what.
One n every 3 to 4 victims of domestic abuse is male so it is comparable. Or are we only counting domestic abuse when they die?
I am a strong believer that domestic violence is wrong, regardless of gender. However, the reason most advertising, support and conversations are centered around women being the victims is because it is more common. I'm not talking like 1 in 2, I'm talking like 5-6 times more likely (if not more) then men to be the victim. Not only that but the physical damage women can inflict is generally a lot less serious due to the natural size and muscle mass differences between genders (not that it excuses the behaviour!).
While we should be aiming our conversations towards children as non gender biased, we need to continue to support women in our community's to the best of our abilities.
Except it's not 1 in 5-6, it's closer to 1 in 3-4, depending on what you read.
I don't think a knife cares who is behind it, you don't need much strength to do some damage.
Also, most men will never hit a woman, no matter the provocation so they will just have to sit there and take it. You can do a lot of damage to someone like that. That goes both ways, of course.
The normal quoted figure is 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 and not all domestic abuse is done with fists.
I think Shannon is trying to say that women are 5-6 times more likely to suffer domestic violence than men.. As in, it's 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 women, and 1 in 10 or 1 in 15 men..
Either way you want to frame it, it's still wrong.
She does specifically say '1 in 2'.