This presidential campaign just turned into an episode of Jerry Springer.
Rumours have long been flying around about the true paternity of former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton.
But now, according to The National Enquirer, the 35-year-old has “secretly undergone a DNA test” – and when they say secret, they mean she didn’t even know about the test – that apparently proves former President Bill Clinton might not be her biological father.
The American supermarket tabloid’s “exhaustive investigation” involved reporters chasing both Chelsea and her mother’s former law partner, Webb Hubbell, around the country to obtain “touch DNA” from them both. (FYI, they used Sharpies and books that the subjects had touched to give autographs – and a Starbucks cup Hubbell had been drinking from – to obtain this rock-solid DNA.)
They then sent the samples off to a lab specialising in paternity testing.
Enter the “bombshell revelation that threatens to turn Hillary’s 2016 presidential campaign into absolute chaos”… the lab result was “inconclusive”.
One would have thought a positive result would be more likely to derail Hillary’s campaign than this nothing verdict, but apparently the finding which “does not discount the possibility” that Hubbell is Chelsea’s father is sufficient.
Bill’s former aide, Larry Nichols, told The National Enquirer: “They can’t question DNA.”
Top Comments
It's a bit sad that Bristol Palin's pregnancy is considered a major political story.
If you believe the story there is nothing wrong with it.So they wanted a child and he was the donor. Who cares. However funny how these stories appear at an appropriate time to derail a Presidential tilt. How can the American people be so hypocritical as to feign shock at this yet children shoot children every day because "they have a right to be armed". Or idolise a wealth of "celebrities" who act in a manner which makes this story look a non event by comparison.
Or get upset at a nipple slip at a half time superbowl musical performance