news

The disturbing reason a 10-year-old girl is facing life in prison.

WARNING: This story includes details that readers may find distressing.

A 10-year-old girl is facing the possibility that she will serve a life sentence in prison after she was charged over the death of a six-month-old baby.

Though she’s only in primary school, the Wisconsin girl is currently being tried as an adult over the shocking crime.

So what happened?

A horrific incident

On October 30 at around 4.30pm police were called to a house in the Wisconsin town of Tilden, where a home daycare also operated.

There had been an incident of some sort and a six-month-old baby boy had somehow suffered serious head injuries. Investigators say there was one adult and three children at the home at the time.

The little boy, who was unresponsive and bleeding from his head, was taken to St Joseph’s Hospital and later flown to Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare. Sadly, the infant, who hasn’t been named, could not be saved and died two days later on November 1.

What Chippewa County District Attorney Wade Newell now alleges is that a 10-year-old girl is responsible for the baby’s death, ABC 5 Eyewitness News reports.

He alleged the girl, who hasn’t been named, dropped the boy accidentally and he hit his head on a footstool. When he began to cry, she stomped on his head, prosecutors say.

“She panicked, didn’t know what to do and didn’t want to get into trouble,” Newell said in court.

The 10-year-old, who had been living in the home under foster care, initially told authorities she hadn't injured the boy, but allegedly later confessed in interviews with police, the New York Daily News reports.

The daycare has remained shut, and so far no one else has been charged in relation to the baby's death.

A child in court

Under Wisconsin law, the 10-year-old girl has been charged with first-degree intentional homicide by someone age 10 or older.

It is one of several states in the US that treat young children as adults when charged with murder.

"By statute, a 10-year-old or older is required to at least start out the process in adult court, and that’s why we’re here today," the judge explained on Monday at the girl's bail hearing.

This doesn't mean, however, that the girl's case will stay in adult court. It may be transferred to juvenile court. Her charges may also be downgraded from the very serious Class A first-degree intentional homicide.

The key to this charge is that the accused intended to kill the victim with their actions, and therefore that it was not an accident.

That's what Chippewa County Sheriff James Kowalczyk alleged in court.

"The injuries sustained by the six-month-boy was not an accident," he said.

However, another charge of first-degree reckless homicide exists in the state. To be found guilty of that Class B felony, prosecutors need only prove that the accused "recklessly caused the death of another human being under circumstances which show utter disregard for human life".

For now though, the young suspect is facing the possibility that, if she is found guilty, she will be given a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment, with or without parole.

Related Stories

Recommended

Top Comments

kimmmmyyy 2 years ago
Many people are talking about THEIR kids, with their PARENTAL care. Let me remind you THIS IS FOSTER CARE. Of course, your kid wouldn't do the things this girl had done, you raised them, and this girl had no such parental care as you are giving your own kid! Of course, the person in charge is taking care of them, but they aren't a parent figure to them. I'm not trying to say this little girl isn't at fault, of course, she is, but doing these types of comparative things isn't such a good clause just because we don't know WHY she went to foster care while your kids haven't, and are with you. We don't know what type of problems she had or anything, she is hidden, and we know nothing about this girl. There is a grand difference between when someone is being raised in foster care and from home, your parents would be telling you what you should and shouldn't do with love and care and etc, meanwhile, the foster care person most of the time just there to feed and "supervise" you. 

inspirelead 6 years ago

I have a 10 year old, he is in the 5th grade and he is definitely old enough to be in control of himself and know right from wrong. We're not talking about a toddler, this is a preteen. To not issue severe punishment is to teach children that they can get away with murder. She should server many years in confinement. The punishment should meet the crime because she is old enough to know what she did. I don't know about life in prison but the punishment should be severe. Maybe release her when she's 30. I don't know but if a 10 year old killed my child, I'd want justice. And probation is not justice. Releasing a killer into the general population is not justice. She killed someone by intentionally kicking them until death. She should be treated as such.

kimmmmyyy 2 years ago
@inspirelead I am mostly reading comments saying, "It's the girl's fault" and "she deserves as much time in prison." But are we going to talk about the case the person who was taking care of the kids SAW her inside when she informed all the kids to stay outside while the infant is asleep?? The adult was in charge, the 10-year-old girl is obviously in the wrong, yes, but she is a child. I understand the parents would want justice for their baby but the adult should be punished as well instead of her license of care only being taken away. She was in charge of all the children in the daycare, she should be more responsible, especially with a 6-month-old baby, is anyone being captive about that?? The little girl shouldn't be the only one being responsible for her actions, concluding the person in charge should be also taking responsibility. I also read another article about the little girl having a mental problem so if it is true, why would the adult allow the mentally issued girl with a baby, the adult should have been paying more attention to the baby AND the mental 10-year-old. Of course, this shouldn't be getting the girl off the hook but of course, not life in prison, this girl is barely 10. Im going to target the parents real quick, if your child got hurt by something that was laying out, maybe sharps scissors. Who would you blame? "Why did you (10-year-old) touch sharp scissors!!" Why would they be laying out in the open when they were out in the open, it wasn't them who took them out, now to connect these two clauses, the daycare attendant saw the girl inside the building who some say had a mental disorder or problem of some sort with a 10-month baby? Did she not order every kid to be outside while the infant was asleep inside? If she did not see the child inside, why did she not notice the 10-year-old wasn't with the rest of the children outside, she is the person taking care of the children, no? The adult should be the one to also blame, she is the one in charge, to take care, of and look after. They both should be at fault, though the little girl shouldn't be given that much of a punishment, she didn't know what to do, she panicked, everyone has different mindsets and she was left ALONE with the 10-month-old. Again, ALONE, lay off the little girl a little, and start to look around how it could have been prevented.