TRIGGER WARNING: This article deals with accounts of sexual assault, violence and suicide. It may be distressing for some trauma survivors.
Imagine being held captive by a powerful terrorist notorious for their sexual abuse of women and young girls.
Lying awake at night, knowing your fate was to be sold or forced into marriage with an older fighter for the militant group.
Being so terrified, as you lay waiting in captivity, that you begged the woman next to you to take your life.
That’s the reality for two sisters from Iraq, who tried to strangle each other to death when they realised they were going to be sold as wives to Islamic State fighters.
Wafa, 27, and her sister were captured along with hundreds of other women from Iraq’s Yazidi religious minority when the town on Sinjar fell into IS hands in August this year,
Fearing they would be forced to marry a captor or sold as a “wife” to a stranger, they tried to take each other’s lives other late one night, a new report by Amnesty International reveals.
A displaced Iraqi Yazidi woman. Yazidis say members of their families men -women and even babies- have been abducted by militants. (Photo: AHMAD AL-RUBAYE/AFP/Getty Images) (Note: this post does not specifically refer to the subject of this picture)
Top Comments
Something we daren't countenance is the fact that these sex slaves are being bombed along with their captors, by the allied forces.
Thank you!! It's refreshing to see someone writing about this, instead of one more article white-washing the ideology that drove Monis's violence against women. Daesh has accurately been described as "political ebola", "a tsunami of violence", etc. It's been sickening to read recent work by Clementine Ford, Rebecca Huntley, Nancy Leong, Jenna Price, etc. all telling us to look somewhere else. This is NOT just any other usual case of domestic violence being ignored. This thing is spreading like wildfire. It's time the feminist movement STOP parroting and start comprehending what's really going on here and the risks we all face.
Sorry but are you actually talking about? I don't understand how this comment relates to the article.
Anothanon is quite rightly referring to the fact that Fairfax reporters and some ABC opinion writers have been avoiding mention of the fact that the Sydney siege terrorist was doing so in the name of terrorism, and not just an extension of his record of domestic violence. The emergence of more facts around his extremism has not been met with adjustments to said reporters' stories.