It’s been a while since all that excitement surrounding the Royal Wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton(15 months, actually) but the honeymoon photos have finally emerged.
Australian magazine Woman’s Day got the world exclusive pics from their holiday at the exclusive island of Desroches. Allvoices.com reports that the couple are furious that the pictures have been publicised, after an unwritten agreement with the press that their privacy would be respected:
Apparently, the Aussie monthly magazine ‘Woman’s Day‘ took the controversial decision to publish the ‘world exclusive’ photographs of Kate and Wills, despite knowing it would not be taken well by the royals.
The magazine’s front page features the royal couple baring a lot of flesh on the Seycelles beach during their honeymoon last May. It is as yet not known how the publication got hold of the exclusive pictures…
Apparently most newspapers knew about the closely guarded secret location of Wills and Kate honeymoon before they jetted off. However, after the royal couple’s request for privacy, the media respecting their private time together, refrained from sending photographers to the honeymoon destination.
Now a full fifteen months after their wedding, Wills and Kate are understood to be feeling betrayed and upset that the beach photographs of their honeymoon were chosen to be published by the Australian magazine, especially of their ‘special time.’
Top Comments
It's weird that these photos are only the public domain over a year after the wedding.
But what's WEIRDER is that they are not in the British press. It's well known that the British paparazzi can be pretty vicious in hunting down exclusive shots of pretty much any celebrity, let alone the most popular Royals on the planet.
The British press are hopefully adhering to the "gentleman's agreement" in place with the Royal Family, whereby the paps are given specific opportunities to photograph the Royals. More power to them, they deserve their privacy. It's awful that Woman's Day feel like these rules don't apply to them, therefore invading the privacy of Kate & William which they've done so much to preserve.
What's worse is that I didn't expect this from MM.
Where are the photoshop disclaimers under most of these images?
The Womans Day cover is clearly shopped