Just after 11am on Wednesday morning, Cardinal George Pell was sentenced to six years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of three years and eight months.
Pell’s sentencing for sexually abusing two choirboys in 1996 was broadcast Australia-wide.
The maximum penalty for Pell’s crimes was 10 years, yet Chief Justice Peter Kidd said this was “not the diminutive factor of my sentence, nor is the maximum penalty the starting point for my sentencing exercise”.
Listen to Mia Freedman, Holly Wainwright & Jessie Stephens unpack the Pell verdict on Mamamia Out Loud… Post continues after audio.
Chief Judge Peter Kidd said Pell’s age – as a 77-year-old – as well as his “good character” was a factor in his sentencing.
The sentence, however, garnered strong reactions from the public, with many sharing their sense that six years, or what will likely be less than four, isn’t enough.
It is absolutely disgusting that #GeorgePell only got 6 years with the chance of parole in 3 years and 18 months. He is an absolutely horrible man who has shown no remorse or recognition of what he has done. How can this be? Nobody should EVER go through what they went through.
— Dominic Clarke (@dclar181) March 13, 2019
A New Theory Emerges At William Tyrrell Inquest
The Quicky
Top Comments
It's just so disgusting that his age and 'good character' (apart from molesting children under his care) were mitigating factors. But even the maximum available sentence of 10 years is a paltry slap on the wrist compared to the life sentence he dealt his victims.