This post was originally published on Role Reboot.
Since most people know when the proposal is coming these days, what’s the point of getting engaged? Just set a date to get married and forget all the fuss.
Last week I was in the emergency room for a rabies shot (don’t ask) and found myself listening to an awkward conversation between a nurse, who had just gotten engaged, and her co-worker:
Co-worker: “I’m mad that you didn’t invite me.”
Nurse: “To what? I just got engaged.”
Co-worker: “Oh, I thought you got married and didn’t invite me to the wedding.”
Nurse: “Um, no, we haven’t had the wedding.”
The uncomfortable conversation then continued with more wedding-related banter. The proposal that she knew was coming. In Italy (of course). How pretty the ring is. How her mom keeps calling about wedding plans. And the venue they’re going to see tonight.
It is with this oh-so-familiar scenario in mind that I humbly call for an end to marriage engagements. Hear me out…
What is the point of getting engaged anymore? You don’t need an engagement to send out wedding invitations, right? And most folks know that they’re going to get married soon (and have been dropping hints and arguing about it long before the “proposal”). Wedding venues can be booked without proof of engagement, and the deposit alone should be enough to demonstrate commitment.
Top Comments
If you don't know that one person is going to ask the question then you shouldn't get married. Of course everyone knows it's coming but it's just that point where you can go from. I knew my fiancée and I were going to get married 12months before we were engaged but I was still surprised when he asked me. No engagement party for me just straight to marriage. The proposal was about him telling me that he is sure we are meant to be and asking me if I was sure with him. He got the ring and I had no choice which I love because I know that ring is what he thinks is beautiful for me :)
It serves as a commitment for those who can't afford to marry yet. Me and my partner are still studying, definitely cannot afford a wedding, but being engaged shows we are committed to each other, even though we can't yet afford the next stage yet. Engagement isn't about any of the stupid materialistic crap mentioned in this superficial article, it's about commitment, the statement that you are dedicated to each other even in this time where money is a struggle and you know marriage is far off. This author has lost sight of the purpose of engagement entirely.
Still would like to know how much your ring was...
But... getting married costs almost nothing. Really. A marriage license is a few dollars. You say getting engaged isn't about stupid materialistic crap and then in the next breath announce you ''can't afford'' to get married. Be engaged, don't be engaged, really, it's no huge deal, clearly the commitment is the binding factor, but the purpose of engagement is to announce an intention to marry in the foreseeable future. It always was, anyway. I'd have thought a wedding that cost anything terribly much fell into the materialistic, unnecessary camp myself (I had one such wedding and it was FABULOUS... but not necessary to the actual marriage).
So, you're implying you shouldn't get a ring until you can afford a ring and a wedding...riiiiiiiight.