Over the past few days, you might have seen the hashtag #Ferguson on social media. And, despite how amazing she is, it has nothing to do with ABC’s Sarah Ferguson.
The Missouri town has become the topic of international news headlines, after a young black man was shot multiple times by police. Peaceful protests have inspired a militarised response from the authorities – and now the world wants to know what’s really going on in Ferguson.
What started the protests in Ferguson?
18-year-old Michael Brown was days away from starting college, when he was stopped by a police officer in the street on August 9. Reports regarding the lead up to his death differ. SBS summarised the arguments of both sides:
What do the police say?
The St. Louis County’s police chief says that Michael Brown was walking with a friend in the middle of a street. When a police officer pulled up and tried to get out of his car, Brown pushed the police officer back into the car. The police say Brown proceeded to climb into the car, and tried to steal the officer’s gun. One shot was fired inside the car, before both Brown and the police got out of the car. On the street, Brown was fatally shot multiple times.
What do witnesses say?
Dorin Johnson, a friend who was walking with Brown in the middle of the street, says that the police officer pulled over and told them to “get the eff onto the sidewalk”. Then, the police officer grabbed Brown around the neck from his vehicle, and pulled him into the car.
Top Comments
Didn't Mike Brown assault a small Chinese man and rob him just minutes before this?
The officer says he attacked him and he shot him in self defense.
Riots ensued and multiple thefts, property damage and assaults have been reported, so the authorities are protecting innocent citizens.
Keeping media out to prevent them from being injured.
I think I'll wait for the investigation before I let the media determine what happened.
I agree, there are different versions of the incident, and it is better to wait for the investigation.
- Statement from the city's chief police: "The Ferguson police officer who shot Michael Brown didn't stop him because he was suspected in a convenience-store robbery, but because he was "walking down the middle of the street blocking traffic." - http://edition.cnn.com/2014...
- "Autopsy results revealed that 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot at least six times, including twice in the head. The teen was also shot four times in the right arm, Dr Baden said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front and appeared to have been shot from a distance." - http://www.news.com.au/worl...
As an American who reads this site it's important to keep in mind that even if Mike Brown was wanted for a crime our judicial system supposedly allows everyone to have a trial. Being a suspect of a crime does not give our police a green light to murder someone in cold blood.
I agree, however, if he did attack the officer, then any form of self defense is acceptable in the preservation of one's own life including takedown force.
he wasnt stopped for the robbery. The DOJ asked for the video not to be released as it may cause ppl like you to draw the wrong conclusions. He was stopped because he was jaywalking while being black. The 'riots' are a bullshit narrative, the multiple eyewitness and media accounts dispute that. but of course black ppl are animals who lash out.
http://www.vox.com/2014/8/1...
All the facts have not come out just yet so I am not
commenting on who is guilty here and who isn’t. My comment is that there is a
big difference between how serious the US police react to “potential threats”
and how Australian Police reacts. One only has to watch the reality police
shows. In an Australian one last week, a man caught speeding , pulled over, got
out , approached the police laughing and then jumped on his car boot saying “youse
have got me” to which the Police laughed as well. In America the cops would
have had 3 back up cars, their guns would have been drawn and they would have
threatened to shoot the man if he did not drop to the ground. I must stress I have seen on the US shows Policemen
shot when motorists get out and approach the car. With drugs creating zombies
and crazies, and the high level of gun crime, it does not surprise me that US
police assume the worst. I don’t think the
victim’s colour was relevant. If it was a white town with high levels of crime
and drug abuse, then the 2 people wandering the streets at night would have
been white. The police are here to protect us.
I know in Australia I am on their side and they do a good job. I
What do you mean who's guilty and who isn't? There's only one person who could potentially be guilty in this situation and that's the policeman who shot an unarmed man. The person who was murdered is the victim. Nothing he could have said or done - short of drawing a weapon, which he did not do - could justify his death. Suggesting he might be guilty of provoking his own murder is the worst kind of victim blaming, like saying a woman was asking for it.
If you think this is just as likely to happen to unarmed white people walking the street, check the stats:
http://www.motherjones.com/...
The issue is when people have deep, unconscious stereotypes, resulting in a prejudice that's so well buried you might not even know it exists until things like this happen. A person can be extremely tolerant, friends with people of every colour, yet still harbour an unconscious stereotype that allows them to draw a weapon more quickly when confronted by a black person than a white one. If you think that prejudice doesn't exist here I believe you are mistaken.
Dear Guest,
Blake has form, so best not to engage with him when it comes to stuff that deals with non-whites being victims...
The police are supposed to be here to protect us - but they do not always deliver. And when they don't they need to be held to account instead of authorities closing ranks, covering up their mistakes - or those in a privileged position supporting the glaring lack of integrity. Your comment smacks of elitism. I would gladly swap the police in the north shore for a day. The fact that you don't believe that colour was relevant is in all likelihood because you've never had to negotiate a reasonable response from the very authorities paid to protect "us".