I was probably about nine.
I had two younger brothers and a little sister and my mum (who didn’t work when we were small) would sometimes pop out to the shops and leave me and my sister, just 16 months older, ‘in charge’. Nothing happened.
Sometimes she’d go next door for a cup of tea and a chat with our neighbour Gail and if we were happily playing or watching TV at home, she’d leave us there, saying, “Yell out if anything happens.” Nothing happened.
I loved being home alone. When mum went back to work and I was sick, but not too sick for her to stay home with me, those days were gold. I’d watch Beauty and The Beast, then Days Of Our Lives and eat Milo from the can (for medicinal purposes). And nothing happened.
Was that luck or was it just life?
Another parenting dilemma: what age would you let your kids’ ears be pierced? (Post continues after audio.)
There has been a lot of talk for years about how young is too young to be left without adult supervision. Cases like the Madeleine McCann abduction fuel the fear, and parents look for an age, a fixed point in time their children will be safe. They’re also, I think, looking for the point they will be immune from blame.
When I was at school in the late 70s, I read a shocking story in the paper about two girls, aged maybe 9 and 10 who’d been murdered in north Queensland. I can picture their faces and I remember the story, but I can’t recall questions about why they were walking home without an adult. There was nothing but sympathy for their families.
Top Comments
it depends on the maturity of the child in question. some eight year olds would be fine for an hour or two while some fouteen year olds you wouldnt leave alone for 15 mins. i was left alone at home from about 7 and nothing ever happened but i have a cousin who was 15 before being left alone and for good reason. only the parent/s know about if their own are suitable to be left alone in most cases so leave it to them unless there is evidence they are not responsible themselves