Resumes? I’ve seen a few. Hundred.
(tangent: this is why I think job seekers should include a headshot with their resume, not because looks matter but because it personalises a highly impersonal process. All CVs tend to look identical and you’re not hiring a piece of A4 paper, you’re hiring a person.)
Very occasionally in a job interview, magic happens. I’ve experienced it three times in my career and each time, not only did the job work out spendidly but the person on the other side of the desk became a close friend.
My first taste of magic happened in my first proper job interview when I was 19 and went to see Cleo editor Lisa Wilkinson about a work experience placement. Well, it was certainly magic for me. I was star-struck almost to the point of muteness to be in such close proximity to my idol and almost 20 years later, I still remember every detail of that 20 minute meeting. She had me at hello and it only took me six months of persistent nagging to secure an actual job.
Years later when I was an editor myself, interviewing new staff quickly shot to the top of my Things I Loathe list. I don’t know many employers who enjoy recruitment. It’s a hideous combination of time consuming, awkward, tedious and risky. The cost of making the wrong decision is high, particularly since it can lead to yet more recruitment. But you persevere in the hope of magic. Or at least competence.
One dull day, while interviewing for a new PA, a tall, smart girl bounded into my office and it was love at first sight. Magic. Her name was Bronwyn McCahon and ten years later, that office is now hers. After throwing her a lifeline from sales to editorial as my PA, she eventually landed my job just as I’d always known she would. A few years after hiring Bron, I was looking to fill another empty junior chair. Drowning in a boring sea of CVs, demoralised by their mind-numbing same-ness suddenly, like a shining beacon, I glimpsed the name “Rupert Murdoch” and a signature.
Top Comments
@Miss_Twist http://www.mamamia.com.au/w...
What really concerns me about this is the admission that some people have made that recruiting companies, etc. look up candidate's names on Google. Let me explain why.
Information you put on Facebook, etc. is within your control. I get that. What about the rest of the internet? Do you really believe that you can control everything that is posted about you online? There is a mum in Victoria at the moment who has had both of her sons die. She was initially suspected of murdering them. It has since been discovered that they died because of a faulty gas heater. Thank God for the poor mum, who must be going through hell. However, thanks to the media reports, which gave her full name and age, there is now a record of this on several online sites.
Should she want to make a clean start, she has to face the possibility that potential employers will see this horrible chapter in her life. She has no control over the fact that it happened, that it was reported, and that it is now online for all to see. That is completely unfair.
That is why I think this practice is totally inappropriate. Because whatever you might think, not all of the information about yourself online is necessarily within your control.
To think otherwise is TOTALLY naive.