Bam.
Last night, The Project host Waleed Aly set an outspoken former terror suspect straight. And in usual Aly style, the smack down is nothing short of brilliant.
In case you missed it, on Monday night, Melbourne man Zaky Mallah commented on ABC’s Q&A program that the Federal government’s behaviour “justified” Australian Muslims turning to extremism. (Read more about that here.)
On The Project last night, Mallah’s controversial comments continued– with the 31-year-old claiming the Australian government was encouraging people to join Islamic State.
Related content: The creepy blogs luring Australians into joining ISIS.
The fiery exchange began with Aly asking Mallah was if he was worried that “maybe somebody watching the Q&A show could see his comments as “a call to arms”.
Mallah — who was acquitted of two terrorism charges in 2005 after being arrested under anti-terror laws in 2003 — replied: “Look, there are some young radicalised Muslims in the community at the moment who have always hated the Abbott Government, from the get-go.
“Last night’s incident from the Minister who suggested that stripping Australians from their citizenship escalated things to a whole new level.”
(Post continues after video)
Top Comments
"a former terror suspect"
Really? That's your headline?
"THIS PERSON WAS CHARGED AND THEN THE CASE WAS DISMISSED! OH MY GOD THEY MUST BE A TERRORIST! LET'S MAKE IT THE HEADLINE! YAYAYAYAY!"
That is the most ridiculous thing...
That was no take down. It was yet another demented media effort to misconstrue the facts and context of this excruciatingly important matter. On Q&A Mallah asked the Minister a hugely pertinent question about the determination of the new citizenship legislation. The Minster gave an answer that was based firmly in ignorance, politics and retribution. Mallah simply observed what some young moslems might make of the Min ister's (Govt's) response. The media and right wing politician then proceeded to go nuts. Why? Did Mallah in fact state the practical truth about the noxious right-wing security platform that the right wing do not want to be heard? Is the ABC fire-storm attack a neat way to obscure that truth? Then Waleed myopically demands that the focus upon the Q&A event, and ensuing responsibility for it, be trained entirely upon Mallah. Waleed steadfastly asserts the matter is not now about the Govt., but solely about Mallahs concluding comment. This is toxically brainless horse manure. It was, is, and should remain, all about the Govt's policy and intent. Mallah's Q&A performance was no more and no less than an effort seeking to better resolve that dangerously obscure payload. Can we have some clear-thinking here please. This is a really important policy area.