We’ve rounded up all the latest stories from Australia and around the world – so you don’t have to go searching.
1. Genuine ‘vampires’ too afraid to tell doctors of blood-sucking habits for fear of stereotyping, study finds.
People who identify as vampires and believe they need to ingest blood for energy don’t seek support from doctors for fear of ridicule and a possible mental health diagnosis, a study has found.
Idaho State University sociologist Dr D.J. Williams found ‘genuine vampires’, who seek out others’ blood to gain energy (as opposed to ‘lifestyle vampires’, who wear black and fake fangs), did not disclose their habits to physicians due to expected negative reactions, Reuters reports.
Dr Williams has studied self-identifying vampires for close to a decade and says they come from every walk of life, including doctors, lawyers and candlestick makers.
He said they are “successful, ordinary people”, but always feel very tired.
The study – based on responses of 11 self-identifying vampires – found fatigue is the main reason they find a consenting adult to cut and ingest blood from.
“The real vampire community seems to be a conscientious and ethical one,” Dr Williams said.
“Most vampires believe they were born that way; they don’t choose this.”
There are believed to be thousands of self-identifying vampires globally.
2. Consumer authorities try to shut down a ‘rip-off’ toy website
Authorities have issued an official public warning about a toy website in response to complaints from furious customers who haven’t received the toys they paid for.
The investigation into Toy Palace, or toypalaceaustralia.com.au, has been led by Consumer Affairs Victoria on behalf of fair trading bodies around Australia, news.com.au reports.
Top Comments
Just a general observation from someone who works as an OT, while I enjoy this site writers often refer to someone by their diagnosed disability or other syndrome....in the health field we don't identify a person by their diagnosis it should be "A woman with down syndrome" "A person with a diagnosis of (insert illness here) "A child with autism" not an autistic child
And just a general observation from a mum of three - I have two autistic children. My youngest goes to school with half a dozen other autistic children and my oldest is involved in two community groups with many autistic young adults. None of the parents refer to our young kids as 'children with autism' or our older ones as 'people with autism'.
I understand the whole idea of using 'with' so the diagnosis doesn't define the person, but to most of us (and we've had this discussion many times amongst ourselves and with our children) it makes it sound as though there is something shameful about being who you are.
I just don't want Mamamia readers to think they have to start watching every nuance of their language because they might upset someone.
I have spoken to a fair few adults on the spectrum and some of them actively hate being referred to as "a person with autism", versus "autistic person".
Not that we shouldn't all try to be sensitive with our language but it often really is hard to know what to say, when there is Group A who prefers to be called X and Group B who prefers to be called B and each group is horribly offended by the other group's preferred term.
I don't think that is what the OP is wanting - for everyone to start feeling paranoid about what language they're using. It would be nice though for the Mamamia writers to take note and occasionally try to incorporate person-first language from time to time as this has been raised by many posters before.
lol, real life vampires. Everyone wants to be special......
What a sparkling comment. I do find it hard to disagree.