By MELISSA WELLHAM
It’s the end of the world, and we’re not doing enough.
This week, a report from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was leaked to Associated Press, and the conclusions drawn therein are pretty dire.
In short: the world is ending. (That’s my wording, obviously. Not the UN’s.)
The “Synthesis Report” – which summarises three previous reports from the UN – is to be released in November after a conference in Copenhagen, so it’s not the final copy and still might be revised.
But if the final report looks anything like the draft, then we all have good reason to worry.
The report unequivocally states that, “Human influence … is extremely likely to have been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. The risk of abrupt and irreversible change increases as the magnitude of the warming increases.”
What are these “abrupt and irreversible changes” going to look like?
1. We’re headed towards ice-free summers in the Arctic.
For one thing, we’re likely to see ice-free summers in the Arctic before mid-century. It’s also possible that Greenland’s entire ice sheet will disappear over the next millennium, which will contribute up to 23 feet to the sea level.
2. Living by the beach is no longer going to be very desirable.
Speaking of the sea level, the report finds that by 2100, sea level rise will have an impact on 70 per cent of the world’s coastlines. Which is a bit scary when you consider that “half the world’s population lives within 37 miles of the sea, and three-quarters of all large cities are located on the coast”.
Top Comments
This is like the Argument over God.
Same thing.
You believe it or you don't.
Like Religion there is for and against.
I think this is the new Religion for Atheists and Greens.
A belief system? Yes, you either believe science, or you don't.
I'm just going to say one thing, and I encourage anyone interested to Google it. Holocene Extinction.
That might have been interesting if you made a point worth discussing. I guess you were saying that, if we aren't careful, we could cause another mass extinction and that we need to act now to try and prevent it.
I actually thought the way he made his point was quite effective - I had to go and google it because there was no explanation.
The point was for people to do their own research, and to see we have been a majority cause of the current mass extinction starting around 10000 years ago, and continuing to this day and for the foreseeable future. We are not the total cause, but our role cannot be ignored. It's like the climate change debate. I don't try to convince people one way or the other, though I'm happy to share my views, but ask them to look beyond the politics and media and draw their own conclusions from actual scientific research.