Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s appearance on Thursday’s panel of The Project began with a clumsy rap and a joke about Tupac. Then things took a turn for the awkward.
Host Waleed Aly asked the PM about whether he thought pop singer Macklemore should be allowed be sing his hit song Same Love during the Grand Final show at the NRL this weekend, a choice which former Prime Minister Tony Abbott openly rallied against this week.
“He should perform whatever he wants to perform,” Mr Turnbull said.
“It’s the halftime entertainment at the Grand Final. They have got a great artist. He will sing his top hits, that’s one of them, that’s great.”
The pop singer’s song choice has been yet another hot button topic setting the same sex marriage debate alight with opinion and outrage, thrusting it directly into the AFL and NRL and the Grand Final weekend.
PM @TurnbullMalcolm shares his thoughts and spits rhymes about the debate surrounding Macklemore’s #NRLGF performance. #auspol #TheProjectTV pic.twitter.com/fczPcFeqsB
— The Project (@theprojecttv) September 28, 2017
Top Comments
Sorry but what does Waleed want? If SSM was just legalised without a survey or equivalent does he think the opposing people wouldn't be behaving the way they are now? Waleed for some reason takes pleasure in trying to 'catch people out' and is quite rude IMO!
I love hearing Malcolm defending a Macklemore song choice and supporting same sex marriage - he may not be the best but he is supporting loud and proud & I think that is enviable!
VOTE YES!!
Waleed Ali has been known and observed to skewer his summisations of discussions and actual circumstances to match his personal agendas often enough in the past, and this is another example.
Overstating the degree and number of actual instances of violence, suppression, attacks and intimidation has been a Waleed method before and he is doing it again here. Seldom quoting actual numbers of actual incidents as opposed to picking up the "perceived" narrative is once again here, is how Waleed proceeds.
"some real nastiness..."..?? This is Waleeds summisation of the overall situation?
What Waleed conveniently ignores, or is truly ignorant of, is that this question has been made divisive in our society by agenda driven focus groups, people who seek to leverage the divisions & incidents in order to force politicians to act on their demands to make the situation go away..
They wish to remove the democratic rights of the vast majority of Australians to vote on this question.
That Waleed, *is* a real nastiness that has longer term consequences, setting an unhealthy precedent. We look disdainfully at countries that allow their politics to be driven by intimidation, we are observing it happen here now and many applaud this development.
Why aren't you demanding your democratic rights to vote on every issue?
That's not how our democracy works