When the Prime Minister stands up at 12.30pm today to deliver his much anticipated make or break National Press Club address there are two words every parent would like to hear him say: Child. Care.
Parents want to hear him announce that the federal government is going to redirect billions of dollars from the failed proposed paid parental leave scheme into the child care system for the one million families that utilise it every year.
They would like him to say that if anything is going to be “rolled gold” it should be the system that has been medically proven to benefit our children and helps parents for up to five years – not just six months.
The Prime Minister’s office has confirmed he is going to co-announce a “families package” and the postponement of his signature paid parental leave scheme today.
The long awaited families package is the result of the Productivity Commission (PC) into Early Learning conducted by the federal government in 2014.
Read more: The draft recommendations of the productivity child care report are out.
Last year the PC recommended significantly paring back the Abbott PPL scheme and redirecting the money into childcare – to improve the system and get the best bang for government buck.
The PC said the money for the PPL scheme would be better spent on our childcare system because the policy “would have few incremental labour supply benefits.”
Getting rid of the PPL scheme is good policy – but only if the money is redirected to the child care budget.
Today should be a historic day for Australia. A day parents remember. A day we could all be proud of.
Top Comments
Why cant we have a choice? PPL or Child Care assistance?
Help every family make the right decision for them?
I really really want to be a stay at home mum, im so scared I will have to get work before we are ready, to keep a roof over our heads, or that Mr-PP will have to work extra hours and lots of overtime to provide. Its a scary time.
Nope, I don't want or hear those words!
Bravo Abbott! Any extra funding towards child care will mean that a child care centre will look after my baby instead of me when it's 4 months old as I won't be able to afford to stay home!
Well I guess that's the right result because I will be back in the work force though?
In my 20 year career you'd think I'd be entitled to a tad more than minimum wage after all the bloody hard work and thousands of dollars in tax I've paid!
I'm disappointed that a feminist site such as this hasn't supported women receiving better entitlements via PPL and in turn the best opportunity for young babies to be raised by their primary carer.
Abbott has lost my vote. Perhaps he should've marketed his scheme better?
What about those women who don't want to stay at home? I love my child but being a SAHM made me chronically depressed and bored.
This site was a very vocal supporter of the PPL scheme until Mia herself finally conceded it was grossly unfair to give far, far, far more welfare to rich people than you give to poor people.
And PPL was only for 6 months anyway, so it was hardly a solution to your problem of wanting to raise your own children.
If you have worked for 20 years though surely you would have put some of your money away? Paying tax does not work like a bank where you take out money to suit your own needs. I've been taxes for over 20 years and I would like to see my money spent on the arts but that's not how it works.. Its not all about me..