Warning: This post deals with child abuse and may be distressing for some readers.
A toddler in nappies photographed in the back of a paddy wagon.
It’s an image making waves around Australia, debate raging over whether the child should have been behind bars in a paddy wagon in the first place and a secondary debate over whether the photographer should have taken the image.
The incident took place last Thursday and was front-page news over the weekend. News Limited report that police were called after reports were made that the 15-month old child was in danger having been being ‘belted’ by its 15-year mother.
Police arrived at the Alice Springs block of flats and found the young mother bleeding from her face.
John McRoberts, Commissioner of Police said in a statement “Police were faced with a bleeding, distressed 15 year old mother holding her crying child who had no obvious signs of injury. The officers tried to speak with the young woman but she was aggressive and refused to allow them to check on the child’s condition.”
The NT News describe the mother’s injuries as occurring as a result of her being attacked by family members attempting to stop her harming her child.
The photographer who took the image of the child, Justin Brierty, told The NT News. “When I heard the child’s voice coming from the back of the paddy wagon, making baby noises, I thought, ‘This is not right,’” He said.
The newspaper report claims that police then tried to prevent him taking photos of the young Aboriginal toddler.
Top Comments
Right... So, putting the child into a safe enviroment is wrong? I would've told the photographer to get nicked, too! What business is it of yours to go around invading privacy? No better than paparazzi
I am more shocked by the fact that the mother of the toddler must have been around 13 yrs old when she gave birth, was being belted up by her family to stop her belting the child, than by the police trying to diffuse the situation with the paddy wagon.
Indeed... No-one seems to care that she must've been like, 13. And that the child was probably fathered by an older family member.