This is singer and rapper Azealia Banks on the cover of British fashion magazine, Dazed & Confused.
And yes, she is in fact holding a pink inflatable condom.
And yes, it’s been deemed too risqué by SEVEN countries who has decided not to display or sell it.
And they’re not necessarily the countries you might have expected to push ahead with the ban. Switzerland, Dubai and Singapore are amongst the nations who’ve decided that this image is just a little bit too boundary pushing to grace the stands of their newspaper and magazine displays.
Dazed & Confused magazine have reacted – well, to match their own name. They’re not sure what all the fuss is about, tweeting, “Just been told our upcoming @AZEALIABANKS cover has been banned from 7 countries so far. Thank God for the Internet, huh?”
Dazed and Confused editor Rod Stanley told the Evening Standard he knew the cover would get tongues wagging.
“I knew this cover would be talked about, but didn’t expect a confident, young woman posing with an inflated condom to cause this much fuss,” he said.
“It’s funny that in a world where extreme images are so accessible, someone posing with something that is used for safe sex is what we get worked up about.”
Are these countries overreacting or is the ban fair enough? Would you expect Australia to ban this cover?
Top Comments
It does look a lot like she's fellating a vibrator - and it's supposed to. I'm not a prude, but I don't think it's appropriate to put that image on the front of a magazine.
I hate that images imitating porn (or porn itself) is constantly shoved in our face without choice. I happen to love porn - but only when I'm choosing to look at it, in private or with a partner. Not when I'm walking down the street, not when I'm with a child (who should not be seeing it), not when the male stranger standing next to me might be looking at her then transferring the image to me. It's just unnecessary and imposing.
You shouldn't have to be pornofied to be a woman on the cover of a magazine. Would you make a guy blow up a condom in the same way like he's fellating it? If not, it's just plain sexist.
I completely agree. I wonder how many of the people who think it's okay for children to see porn-like images actually have children themselves or have any understanding of the harm that sexualised images have on children?
While I fully agree with both of you and my first thought was similar in regards to Porn and children, I actually think a child would just see a woman blowing up a balloon, well a young child anyway. At least she's completely dressed.
I definitely would have known what it was when I was a kid. We were on the look out for anything that looked like anything even vaguely rude!
Is anyone else pissed off by Dubai constantly being referred to as a 'country'? It's part of the United Arab Emirates.