By ROSIE WATERLAND
Remember that awesome Australian movie The Sapphires? You know the one I mean – about that white dude who has four slightly tanned back-up singers? The standout star was Chris O’Dowd? Some skinny Aussie girls were in it?
No?
Allow me to refresh your memory:
Remember that movie? Yeah – me either. But that’s the DVD cover about to be released across the USA and Canada.
I do remember an awesome film about an Australian indigenous girl-group who performed for the troops in Vietnam, while exploring issues of race, identity, love and relationships. I do remember Chris O’Dowd being fabulous in his role of manager as one part of an ensemble cast in which the incredible indigenous women were the stand-outs.
Am I crazy, or did the person who designed that cover see a different film to me?
This is the movie I watched:
Why not use that cover?
Yeah yeah – I get that Chris O’Dowd has a bit of a name in the US and the distributor, Anchor Bay, is just trying to sell as many copies as possible. But Muriel’s Wedding was huge in the US and that was advertised off the back of an image of a then-unknown Toni Collette’s face. Shine used a then-unknown Geoffrey Rush.
But there’s more going on here than simply using a recognisable name to sell more DVDs.
The negative implications of making a film about black women look like it’s about a white man should outweigh any marketing concerns. This film is not only about women, it’s about Indigenous women. That fact deserves to be celebrated.
Hiding those women and the colour of their skin under a veil of blue in a ridiculously photoshopped background – behind a man – is absurd.
Top Comments
Saw this yesterday morning and spent so much time having the same argument with (predominately) middle-aged white men - Yes - it's a cynical marketing thing. No - that doesn't make it acceptable. Yes - the racist and sexist implications of this design are real. No - it is not necessary for everybody to just shut up about this because (it makes you uncomfortable, oh and) there are "more important things" to address. It's called multi-tasking.
"It's called multitasking."
THANK YOU. Apparently worrying about a DVD cover means we'll never get around to anything else??
I think this is indicitative of the target market. Yes, I wish advertising had more morals about it but these people aren't trying to turn society into a racist patriarchy, it already is one. They are just marketing to it. Not that that makes it ok, It's just more a sign of how far we really have to go.