by MESHEL LAURIE
Yesterday morning, like every morning this week, I fished around my bed-side table before I even opened my eyes, grabbing for my phone. I know I wasn’t the only one compulsively checking the internet for information about a woman I’d never met, but for whom I’m now grieving, Jill Meagher.
The news websites informed me of the terrible break in the case overnight, and Jill’s fate was confirmed. As I sat up in bed, feeling so sad for all the people who knew and loved her and for everyone feeling they could’ve prevented it in some way, I considered the debate about the role of the media in tragedies like this.
Although I’ve been on the receiving end of some truly embarrassing attempts at journalism over the years, the fact is that I’m a member of the dreaded “mainstream” media myself. While I’m not always it’s proudest member, there are times when it’s capabilities within the community inspire me, and it’s self-serving detractors remind me that they are on the outside looking in for a reason.
Australia’s media can be ceaselessly cheesy, laughably sensational and at times it’s so insensitive that it sickens the citizens it so desperately wants to impress. A low point was reached earlier this year when a news chopper hovered over a NSW woman as she crouched beside the body of her daughter, killed in an accident on their farm. The footage from the chopper was aired on the news and uploaded to the network’s website which is obviously disgraceful. A very, very long way back from that desperate precipice is the coverage of Jill Meagher’s disappearance.
As a nation held its breath for news of a girl vanished, seemingly before our very eyes, was it unreasonable for the media to stalk information and witnesses? On the contrary I believe it’s invaluable. There can’t be many among us who wouldn’t recognize Jill’s face now, who don’t know about the man in the blue hoodie, the CCTV footage, the U-turning car, the witnesses who needed to come forward. That is the very important function of the media, the value of a huge, well-oiled machine for information dissemination. As anyone with a person missing from their world will tell you, the public’s attention is as fleeting as it is crucial. Updating the “story”, finding new angles, keeping the public thinking, and talking about it can be a dirty job, and it can result in people like Jill being reduced to characters in an intriguing TV mystery. It can also nudge a memory, prick a conscience and perhaps release a family from the torment of not knowing.
Top Comments
Sorry, going to break from the emotive groupthink over what large sections of the media have turned into the Cult of Jill Meagher.
Yes, this is a heartbreaking story about the rape and murder of a much loved young woman - no argument there, but it's also largely a MELBOURNE crime story.
Its breathless/hysterical reportage nationally has seemed bizarrely OTT to me.
It feels like the story has been whipped-up into one great big soap opera. In other words -- I'm saying the ceaseless coverage is distancing me from the story's real emotional impact and making it feel like a product.
The media needs to back-off and just report the story NOT confect a highly emotive drama --This though, seems to be sadly par for the course these days.
Maybe this is an opportunity for Mamamia to educate its readership about WHY the community needs to be careful what it posts online about the accused and how that could jeopardise the trial. The average person understandably has little idea how this all works.
Whether or not someone agrees with the online vigilante justice (I don't - not a fan of lynch mobs), the point is it could do so much harm to a case. Do it, Mamamia!