In 2015, everyone was talking about Rachel Dolezal.
Dolezal was the president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) chapter in Spokane, Washington.
She was also an instructor in Africana studies at Eastern Washington University.
Dolezal had two African American sons – one biological and one adopted.
She also happened to be white.
Dolezal became the centre of a media storm when it was discovered she was actually the biological daughter of European American parents.
Her ruse opened up debate about racial identity, fraud, cultural appropriation, and trans issues.
The Rachel Divide is dividing viewers. Post continues.
Her critics said she had committed cultural appropriation and had acted fraudulently, while her supporters said race didn’t need to be based on biology.
Dolezal was roundly slammed for misleading the African American community and she was dismissed from her roles with both the NAACP and Eastern Washington University.
Top Comments
Why is ok if a male decides to be female (or vice versa) and can choose to represent and identify themselves as such? But when someone chooses to identify as a different cultural or ethnic background the world looses it's mind? How is one ok and not the other?
All these other tweets that you've shared as part of the article, if it were a trans person, wouldn't they be vilified for expressing their opinion that the person can't choose how they identify themselves?