So you’re sitting at home on a Monday night, settling in to watch My Kitchen Rules or Q&A (whatever floats your boat, no judgement here).
You’re just about to take that first sip of your cup of tea or glass of wine, when you receive a text.
It’s from your ex. Ugh.
You expect it say, “I love you, I miss you, you’re the most amazing sex I’ve ever had, please take me back”.
Or perhaps, “Please stop retweeting my pithy Q and A commentary, it makes me deeply uncomfortable.”
Or even, “Hry bsbe wat yui up to?”, if they’re the type to drunken text on a Monday night.
But instead, your text message says this: “John R’s results. Tested two months ago. HIV: NEG, Gonorrhea: NEG, Chlamydia: POS, Syphilis: NEG. Disclaimer: This person may have had sex since being tested. Reply STOP or HELP. Msg&Data rates may apply.”
That’s right. John R has just texted you his STD results.
Because apparently, that’s a thing now.
So if you’ve contracted an STD, need to tell your sexual partner or previous partners and aren’t that into awkward conversations: there are websites that can help YOU.
These sites allow you to request your STD results from doctors… and then share them with a past sexual partner or (if the results are negative) with someone you would, ahem, like to get intimate with, through an emailed link or a text message.
Once users give sign up by providing some basic personal information — like their name, age, phone number — Qpid.me creates a records request that gets e-faxed to their doctor. When the results come back, users are able to share a one-time use link with anyone they want. The site shares results for HIV, gonorrhea, Chlamydia, syphilis, hepatitis C antibody, as well as the HPV and hepatitis A vaccines, but does not include HPV and herpes status.
Proponents of the site say it empowers users to get and stay on top of their STD results in an easy way. For too long, health care providers have told patients that “no news is good news,” said Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, a professor of medicine and public health at UCLA who serves as a medical advisor to Qpid.me.
“People have a right to that information,” he said, adding that “anything that promotes more conversation, more dialogues and more transparency in sexuality is a good thing.”
Sex just got tech savvy. Or rather: more tech savvy.
With websites, text messages and phone apps now assisting in the discussion of sexual health, it represents a definite shift away from the social mores of the past. Where once sexually transmitted diseases would only have been discussed in hushed tones and behind closed doors, now your private records are an open book (or e-book) – to whomever you want to share that information with.
No awkwardness required.
Of course, much like the argument against teenagers having sex in cinema theatres applies – “if you’re too young to be having sex at home, you’re too young to be having sex” – some might say that if you’re not comfortable discussing sexual health openly and honestly, perhaps you should get comfortable with it, before you get some.
The website that offers this service, Qpid.me, is one of a number of other websites, such as U Should Know (a somewhat ominous website name) and inSPOT (which sends anonymous postcards to past sexual partners saying that you – ‘anonymous’ – have since been diagnosed with an STD). The proliferation of these websites indicates that not only is social media playing a bigger role in the procurement of sex (think of apps like Grindr), but the aftermath. Perhaps even the act itself.
At the moment, these websites are only found in America – but with STDs on the rise among young people in Australia, perhaps there is something to be said for social media having a place in our sex lives.
The ABC reports that:
Australian HIV infection rates increased by more than 8 per cent in 2011… The annual surveillance study into sexually transmitted diseases in Australia shows the latest rise contributes to a 50 per cent growth in infection rates over the past 10 years. The report also shows diseases like gonorrhea and Chlamydia are becoming more common.
People between the ages of 20 and 29 are the group highest at risk. And the place where this group interacts – and gets most of their information, and flirts through pokes and winky-smileys – is undoubtedly online.
At the end of the day (or perhaps the beginning of the night, boom tish), the most important consideration is whether or not websites, apps and text messaging make it easier to be safe about sex. And if it does, then bring on the Australian version Qpid.me. Perhaps OZCupid.
The only question after that would be how long until OKCupid and OZCupid join forces, to provide the ultimate online dating, sexing and sexting experience.
Would you ever text your STD results to a romantic partner? Do you see the development of websites like these as a positive thing?
Top Comments
I recently went to the GP with abdo pain linked to period and feeling like period pain all of the time. I'm being tested for endo, but the GP as a matter of course they tested me for chlamydia. I was positive, BUT my only sexual partner for almost 10 years (including since my last STI test 3years ago) was tested negative for everything. In our confusion, and due to our GP's lack of knowledge on the subject, we called a helpline on the issue. We were told there had been few cases lately similar to our situation, where people were falsely tested positive for chlamydia. I can't get a clear answer, was I falsely tested negative 3 years ago, or was I falsely tested positive this time??? I would have hated to get this result by text though.
A funny thing happened though. When we went to the GP to discuss my result, the GP asked if we would share future results together and implied that because I had tested positive that we'd break up. In the scheme of things (ow I'm not an emotional wreck) it's nothing comparedto what we've been through in the past and the idea of breaking up was never considered. We trust each other, so had nothing to worry about.
I dated a guy and stupidly let him not wear a condom because I was on the pill and he swore he had been tested. Yeah he lied! As soon as we broke up I went and got an std test. And of course was positive for chlamidia. Negative for HIV but it can take three to six months to show! So I called him to let him know. I didn't get angry I was very polite. I explained to him that HIV testing takes three to six months to be considered negative and as I get stressed easily could he please go get tested ASAP so I know where I'm at etc. All was good until I texted him the next week asking how he went. He played dumb and was nasty saying he didn't give it to me and to stop harrassing him for a test cos he wasn't getting one. I know he gave it to me cos he was the only guy I was with for two years. So now I have to wait another month for another HIV test and then another three months to be in th clear. The stress is eating me up. I'm so angry that I trusted him. I hate him for this.