1. Terror Raids
Yesterday’s raids – the biggest anti-terrorism operation in Australia’s history saw 15 people detained, two charged and nine released after a plot was uncovered to “shock, horrify, and terrify” the community.
Omarjan Azari, 22 was charged yesterday with preparation/planning for terrorist attack.
Police allege he had a plan to randomly seize a member of the public and behead them before uploading a video of the act to social media.
Top Comments
I have got to ask why the police needed 600 officers to arrest two people. And let's face it the second probably isn't even related, the cops just stumbled across a gun.
Sorry 800 officers.
You've got to ask what is more "terrifying" calmly picking up a few suspects on their way home from the shops or fervently publicising "Australia's largest police operation". You've also got to wonder why a group that has been under investigation for months just happens to get rounded up a few days after raising the threat level and joining a war.
These men may well have been breaking the law but they are being used for far more than that.
I feel for the girl who's facing court over leaking about the scholarship. She did what she thought was right and let's face it it's a non-existant scholarship... bah.
Yeah I think there's a fine line there, but I wonder what the definition of 'whistleblower' is and why she couldn't fall under that and therefore have immunity against prosecution? I suppose it comes down to the definition of corruption? I think the scholarship given to Frances is corrupt. Others say it was just a favour. Still others say maybe she deserved it (I know, that last category of people does my head in).
Either way this whole thing is dodgy.
I don't. She illegally hacked a private citizen's details and passed the info to New Matilda. Why didn't New Matilda's journalist operate through legitimate channels? Do the crime, do the time. She is an educated adult.
Nope, not me. When you begin a job like that you sign a confidentiality agreement. Most unethical to break it, and ending up in court was a foregone conclusion. Maybe she did what she thought was right, but she must have expected this outcome.
I would have thought she could argue it was in the public interest.
Any lawyers got a comment on this?