“We weren’t able to positively impact on this young man’s life. He was too damaged.”
A 15-year-old ward of the state killed his baby son, and authorities say there’s nothing they could have done to prevent it.
The young father bashed his premature four-week-old son’s head against a door or wall in the hospital while the mother was out of the room.
The baby died from his injuries days later.
A West Australian parliamentary committee heard the teenage father had substance abuse problems and several criminal convictions including two involving violence, Perth Now reports.
Despite that, the father was allowed unrestricted access to his son.
The Director-General of the West Australian Department for Child Protection and Family Support, Emma White, told the hearing that the teen had no history of harming children.
“We had nothing to suggest those vulnerabilities would result in the tragic situation,” she said.
In the weeks before the baby’s birth, the department had trouble keeping up with the teen, who had been in state care since he was 12, because he had moved to Bunbury from Perth with the baby’s mother.
“We were running to catch up with this young man,” Ms White said.
She told the committee that the teen had completed drug and alcohol treatment, but had not started an anger management program before the incident occurred.
Top Comments
The mother of this teen boy needs to have a good hard look at herself before pointing the finger at scapegoats.
Welfare DOES NOT drive around suburbs with a big net scooping up kids playing in front of their house. Welfare removes kids in harms way from their parents, siblings and/or associated others (usually mum's boyfriend).
So what happens when this kid is released, age 25, back into society? Sadly I can predict his future - at the risk of being un-PC, this will include more jail stints. Shockingly, kids need to be removed from abusive situations before they are two years old to reduce the effect of harm on their brain development and increase a positive outcome.
As an aside, where's the teen's dad in all this? He should be a positive role model in his son. So before we blame the mum 100%, let's blame the (absent) dad too.
The fathers mother passes the buck onto the government and the hospital, perhaps she needs to look at herself.
Exactly this boy was 12 years old when he went into care yet the mother blamed them for the 3 years he was in care. Surely he was fairly damaged at the age of 12 to necessitate him going into care.