Last night, upon news that Uber had been given a specific zone at Melbourne airport for the pick-up and drop-off of passengers, taxi drivers staged an impromptu protest.
Creating a blockade from about 9.30pm, drivers parked their cars in the most inconvenient of locations, blocking passengers from getting close to the airport when dropped off.
Rumours circulated that it wouldn’t be the only protest – and the only blockade – taxi drivers would be engaging in as the new Uber zone goes live.
Taxi drivers aren’t happy. That we know, and they are making it clear.
There’s no doubt – the struggle for their drivers to carve out space for themselves in a market that’s become saturated has been difficult. There’s no doubt their struggle for a consistent and a solid wage has exponentially become harder as Uber drivers take to, and monopolise, the road. There’s no doubt that the fact the average price of taxi licences in Sydney has halved since the launch of Uber – worth about $406,000 in 2012 to $200,000 in 2017 – has monumental knock-on effects for drivers, their families and their livelihoods.
And there’s no doubt a fear of the future, a fear for their industry, is a legitimate and stressful kind of foresight.
But here’s the thing: We don’t book an Uber out of spite, nor do many of us book an Uber because they’re the shiny, new kid in town and we’re interested in giving them a whirl.
We book Ubers because they are, well… better.
We book Ubers because of all the times we struggled in taxis.
Top Comments
There's a remarkable amount of non-understanding and plain straight out Ignorance by many.
Yes, taxi drivers are not saints, but then again, who is doing the regulating? Are the government regulators doing so to ensure that the fleet is well behaved? No, likely they are not.
Sure, owning a Taxi comes with the privilege of big fees (Not licence, but 'Plate' in most states), but it's really nothing more than the government rifling the operators pockets. And what does the owner get for his money? Not much, really, other than being allowed to use 'Ranks'
Then there's another service that has existed for just as long as taxis, and which DO address most of the concerns that people have about taxis. The Hire Car industry.
Clean cars, Arrive on time with pre-booking, fixed price fares, competent drivers, safe, and drivers do assist with luggage and shopping.
You can run an account, pay cash, or use most Credit/Debit cards or even Cabcharge facilities
You see them around, the nice, late model luxury cars, often with a distinctive numberplate.
They do pay a licence fee, they do have insurance, but cannot use ranks, and suffer from regulations that prohibit any exterior markings, except maybe a logo, but definitely no advertising
Some operators offer a fare that is incredibly competitive with taxis. Google may respond appropriately if you search for Limousines or Hire Cars.
You wouldn't consider an Uber again
I operate 2 cars here in my town, and 50 taxis hate me because I provide the service that 50 taxis can't or won't provide
Uber pays no tax and no licensing fees like taxis do. That's why it's cheaper (unless surging of course). It is a race to the bottom as drivers depreciate their own vehicles and are paid peanuts. Oh, most people do not realise that most uber drivers are cabbies anyway. A disgruntled taxi passenger can complain to the taxi services commision whose job it is to regulate the industry. The TSC failing to do their job has led to the poor service in the industry. Why should licence hilders be punished for this? As for putting your kids in an uber, be very careul. No cameras or minimun safety measures as in taxis makes it a very risky proposition. Basically anyone can pick up your child, that's what you get for "cheaper" fares.