This argument caused controversy with my Facebook friends, what do you think?
There was a debate of epic proportions on my Facebook recently.
Question in point: should stay at home mums (or dads) have a cleaner? Cue the world, that is my Facebook page, erupting in harsh and judgemental opinions.
Some say yes, their argument being that they are a stay-at-home parent not a stay-at-home cleaner. Others say no, claiming that if the parent has time/ability to be home 24/7 they also have time to clean.
I find the issue fascinating. In my household, we are both working parents, but we don’t have a cleaner.
Would I get one? Maybe, but I’d have to tidy up enough to actually be happy for a stranger to see how I live on a regular basis (oh the irony).
Did I consider it when I was a stay-at-home-mum? No, I honestly didn’t.
Do I care if stay-at-home-parents have a cleaner? Not really. But I don’t really see the point of a stay-at-home parent having a cleaner to be honest, but that’s from my experiences.
My house was definitely cleaner when I was at home with the kids, especially when they were young. I’d put the baby in a carrier and literally clean all day. I do not do that now, and not just because they don’t fit any baby carrier anymore.
This particular conversation basically surrounded the idea that stay-at-home-parents felt entitled to hire a cleaner and some people disagreed with that.
The idea was that stay-at-home parents were at home to spend time with their kids, not spend their time as a house-keeper.