By AMY STOCKWELL
And there it was, in all its revolting glory….
Yesterday, instead of a woman in her workplace being discriminated against for having children, I was seeing a woman in her workplace being discriminated against for not having children. I guess it’s a nice change, right?
You see, watching Sunrise is a guilty pleasure of mine. I’ll also admit to a healthy crush on Andrew O’Keefe. Yesterday Sunrise and fill-in host, Andrew O’Keefe, were together in beautiful harmony.
A harmony that was shattered when I heard the Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, talking about the Baby Bonus.
In its mid-year Budget update on Monday, the Government announced that it will reduce the Baby Bonus from $5000 to $3000 for every child after your first.
Tony Abbott disagreed and outlined his child-rearing credentials. He then said, ”I think if the Government was a bit more experienced in this area, they wouldn’t come out with glib lines like that.”
Later on ABC radio, the Prime Minister said that it was up to the Leader of the Opposition to explain what he meant by his statement (which seemed fair in the circumstances). Mr Abbott said to 3AW’s Neil Mitchell, “Please…I was alluding to my own experience of a double pram [for two daughters, born 15 months apart]”.
By his own account, when he was talking about fiscal decisions relating to the Baby Bonus, Mr Abbott was referring to his own experience of having children. An experience that the Leader of the Opposition says the current Government needs – but doesn’t have – to make decisions about the Federal Budget.
Top Comments
The ABC reportage on cuts to the baby bonus cited a vox-pop that was, to my mind, a stand-out. According to the ABC, Bernadette Mitchelle, a mother of three, claims that the cuts will make parents think long and hard. She was quoted to have said "..it would definitely impact on our decision if we were going to have a fourth [child]."
If the cuts to the baby bonus are making anyone "think long and hard" about a very serious 18 year [1] commitment, then any reasonable person would applaud such policy.
To me, given that birth is now controllable to varying degrees, there is a moral obligation on a person to think very long and hard about bringing another person into existence
[1] 18 years is the legal minimum. I would venture that being a parent is a life-time commitment.
I saw that too it made me think that if you $5000 or $3000 is a major factor in the decision making process about an entire human being - the decision should probably be no
This is a great article....Tony Abbott clueless or calculated...?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/...