Rejection hurts. That’s not a new thing.
But now, to avoid this at all costs, millennials are presenting themselves online as disinterested and detached, even if they feel the exact opposite.
If you haven’t heard, nonchalance is the epitome of cool, and I am completely unversed in the art of it.
In the real world, when someone doesn’t really care about or is unwilling to put effort into having a conversation with you, they make it clear. They’ll divert eye contact or barely make any, fill their responses with ummms and ahhhs instead of genuinely thought out replies, and perhaps even give you the antagonising cold shoulder.
But online, it’s a whole other story.
Reading body language, gauging facial expressions – it’s a near-impossible feat, and a soon to be extinct one.
Hence, this absurd rule. Much like the name ‘Voldemort’, no one outwardly speaks of it, but its existence is very much omnipresent.
The guidelines are simple: If it takes someone, say, 4 hours to reply to your message, you must wait four hours or more before responding.
Why? One word. COOL.
But it doesn’t stop there, as I found out.
The rule not only applies to someone you are romantically interested in. It apparently applies to friends as well.
Why? Because COOL.
Admittedly, I’ve unknowingly been a perpetrator of this rule due to the pressure of conforming to generally accepted millennial behaviour.
However, I’ve come to learn that the process of getting to know someone is never “cool”, or free from awkward hiccups.
Top Comments
This is ridiculous - what a waste of energy! I certainly couldn’t be bothered, not the least of which is by 7 hours 30 seconds later I would have entirely forgotten to reply. I reply as soon as I receive something, or as soon as practicable, too much going on in my life and my head to play silly games.
This is hardly new.
Look at something like Grease. Sandy is talking to Danny and he has to act all aloof because his friends are near.
Or during a conversation with Kinickie and they hug and have to separate and be 'Cool'.