We’ve got the biggest news stories from Australia and around the world so you don’t have to go searching.
1. 15 minutes to live
Sydney siege hostages have spoken to 60 Minutes and the Seven Network’s Sunday Night saying that Man Horan Monis told them they had 15 minutes to live.
One of the hostages, Marcia Mikhael, a 43-year-old mother-of-three said that she lost hope at one point.
“He told us, ‘For every person that escapes, I will shoot two.’ That was when I lost hope.”
“That’s when I asked him if I could call my kids and if I could speak to them.
“I actually wanted to hear their voices for the last time.
“I told them that I loved them very much and I needed them to remember that.
“My eldest son kept telling me ‘Mum, stop it, everything’s going to be okay’ and I kept telling him ‘I know, I know but just remember that I love you, I love you so much’ and then I had to hang up.”
Hostage Selina Win Pe has told 60 Minutes that she begged for her life.
“I said please don’t shoot me, please don’t shoot me.
“I only have my mum, please don’t shoot me. He looked me straight in the eyes and said, ‘You have 15 minutes.'”
2. Prince Andrew denies claims of underage sex slave
The Duke of York has finally broken his silence over claims he had an underage sex slave.
He said he wanted to “reiterate and to reaffirm the statements which have already been made on my behalf by Buckingham Palace”.
Top Comments
So these ISIS guys, rape is allowed in their religion? Murder too it seems, but then again they wouldn't be the first religion to murder people in the name of God, but wow rape, that's really innovative of them, of course religious people have raped people before but first time I've heard of people announcing it's part of their religion.
I wonder where it is written in their religious text and how it is worded? Maybe "to honour thy god though shalt rape"?
So the home birth people are suing the hospital because the midwife didn't get to them in time, yes well that's what can happen when you choose to give birth outside a hospital!
If they had been denied a home birth I bet they would have raised the roof!
Surely they could have called an ambulance?
Wow. Cold. Perhaps they trusted the hospital when they said a midwife was on the way? They were in a position of vulnerability (as is every woman when in labour) and placed their faith and trust in a registered midwife and the person who assured them another would be sent.
The fact that their trust has been rewarded by the death of their precious child is devastating enough without you blaming them in that passive aggressive fashion & certainties that calling an ambulance would have prevented that death.
How dare you.
The point is they don't want to do things the sensible way by giving birth in a hospital, but when it all goes wrong they then want to sue! I'm fed up with people expecting other people /organisations paying for their own mistakes, and we in the long run pay for this, because if the hospital has to pay out to them that's money that could be used elsewhere for other sick patients in the hospital, yes I know it probably comes out of the hospitals insurance but then paying for high premiums is the price the hospital has to pay, also we already live in a hugely legalistic culture where lots of paperwork is required to do the simplest thing because of people like this who sue for things that are their own fault.
Of course it is sad that their baby died but just as appalling is the fact they wish to place the blame on others rather than take responsibility for it themselves.
I think perhaps your failing to consider an important point, and that is that this was a HOSPITAL endorsed program, that the HOSPITAL encouraged the parents to take part in. I agree that if the parents had been on the phone after the child's birth (which the article suggests they were), and the medical professional they were speaking to knew there was no midwife yet present, that it would have been important for that professional to ask lots of questions about the baby, the birth, and determine if an ambulance should have been ordered instead of still waiting for the midwife who they should have had a fairly accurate ETA for.
Yes, the parents (nor the hospital) didn't call an ambulance, but they did call the hospital, who had organised their home birth, asking about a midwife who should have arrived already.
You might be quicker to panic, or more "assertive" in your request for an ambulance, but I know that if it were me in that situation and the team I had been dealing with antenatally had told me to wait for the midwife, then I would have trusted them and waited.
What a tragic outcome of that trust.
Yes, home births have additional risks. If it is so damn risky then why are the hospital running and endorsing an home birth program of they can't put simple measures in place to ensure quick and adequate attendance to the births? Surely this couple have a right to question the program given the circumstances surrounding the death of their child.