In what is absolutely not breaking news, television presenter Samantha Armytage spent the weekend wearing full briefs.
Now being reported across multiple Australian media channels, the Sunrise presenter was caught running errands and, you know, just generally living her personal life on Sunday.
The summer wind blew and happened to reveal a barely visible panty line against the 40-year-old’s casual dress.
According to reports from The Daily Mail, who broke the story and ran multiple images of Armytage’s backside, “The TV personality’s oversized granny panties showed through the garment with a clearly visible line.”
Now, according to Buzzfeed Australia, the TV host has called in lawyers in response to the article.
“I’m not making any comment as it’s with the lawyers,” Armytage told the website. (Post continues after gallery.)
Top Comments
Well I realise I'm part of the problem here as since reading the article I googled the daily mail article to see the photo, though I realise i am adding to their click bait, but I just wanted to know what the original story was. Well I'm quite amazed you can see a tiny bit of panty line of what look like a totally normal pair of undies, not that it should matter what type of undies they are but still they make it sound like she had the worlds sag goest undies on. It is virtually inpossible in most outfits not to show a bit of panty line unless you choose to wear a kaftan, or like Kate Fischer wear a bed sheet (this explains that shot now Kate was worried someone would see her panty line!)
I find this whole thing quite spalling, but I dispose it gets daily mail click bait which unfortunately I've contributed to, so I guess this will be the latest thing Feeling like I would like to take a time machine back to the days before the internet where TV stations didn't show this stiff because viewers would have complained to the censorship board if they did.
I think the level of onvasion of privacy into everyone's life is such a concern, I think a lot of celebs don't realise that a lot of us general public would be quite supportive if some of them banded together to do something about privacy. Why would people like me be supportive? We'll because most of us our losing our right to privacy but don't have the resources to fight it, if celebs fought it then the flow on would come down to us little people. For instance I sent a private letter to a government department which they then scanned onto their website, because it turns out their policy is to make any letter publicly available. I don't have the financial resources to fight this, but if celebs got together to start a privacy group or something and fought for legislation then it would benefit the rest of us.
WTF is all I can say. Clearly they don't have anything worthwhile to report on so they bull this sort of crap out of their backsides. Really who cares what undies she wears