1. Royal Baby
The Duchess of Cambridge is pregnant with her second child. The exciting news was confirmed by a tweet posted from the official account of the British monarchy last night.
Speculation is that she is about eight weeks pregnant. The announcement was made as she is suffering severe morning sickness as she suffered with her first pregnancy.
Since William is second in line to the British throne, this would make the new baby fourth in the order of succession, bumping Prince Harry down to fifth and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie sixth and seventh after their father Prince Andrew.
The Prince has spoken about how excited the couple are to media in the UK.
“She’s feeling ok thanks,” the Prince said. “It’s been a tricky few days, a week or so.”
“But basically we are thrilled, it’s great news, early days.”
“We are hoping things just settle down and she feels better. I’m going to go and look after her now.” Reports The Mirror.
Meanwhile Prince Harry has welcomed the news of the Duchess of Cambridge’s pregnancy as “very exciting” – joking that he cannot wait to see his brother “suffer more”.
He said Kate was coping with her illness and expressed his wish that the couple would be able to enjoy some privacy during her pregnancy.
Betting has already started on the big event with bookmakers Paddy Power offering wagers on hair colour, weight, whether the royal baby will actually be royal babies, and names with Elizabeth and Henry
coming in at 10/1.
Top Comments
Jacquie Lambie released her family tree to the ABC. According to it, she is (possibly - the record isn't clear) 0.25 per cent Aboriginal - one x two-hundred-and-fifty-sixth, and it's the first the local Indigenous population have heard of any relationship. Hard to see the basis for her incorporating this "Aboriginality" into her maiden speech.
Firstly, a quarter Indigenous is significant. My kids will be a quarter Greek, and I hope they speak Greek like their dad, grandpa and great grandma and that they know about their history and culture. It's a significant part of their genetic and cultural background. If they were a Indigenous, then the same would apply.
Secondly, honouring the traditional owners of the land is a sign of respect.
And finally, given the utter shit the Indigenous people have had to go through since colonisation (y'know, like the casual attempt to wipe them out), it's significant and important if someone of that heritage gets a voice in politics.
Its one quarter of one percent, not 25%.
She doesn't have a significant heritage. Um not 25 per cent, Voms. Clearly being a quarter Aboriginal would be highly significant. one-two-hundred-and-fifty-sixths Aboriginal. That is one quarter of one per cent. That means, if you put 256 of her people in that generation, six or seven generations ago, in a row, one - just one - of them is Indigenous, out of the 256. If her story checks out. If I claimed that a single, say, French ancestor seven generations ago was relevant, people would say I was having a lend of myself! Note that the Tasmanian INdigenous families say they have never heard of her. To be Aboriginal in Australia you have to be of significant INdigneous ancestry AND be acknowledged and accepted as such by an Aboriginal family or community. Lambie has lots of amazing qualities - but being Indigenous is not one of them.
Re no.6 I shudder to think that this woman may get to influence decisions that out govt makes. This is why weirdo parties like pup and greens should remain as novelty acts and not get involved in politics.
Re no 7, I think we should review the legal process that causes men to be put in such a helpless situation that they respond with violence. I know many non violent, good fathers who were torn apart by viscous ex wife and greedy lawyers who used children as pawns in their evil plans.
Funny how all the women who are torn apart by their vicious ex husband's somehow generally manage not to turn to murdering their ex and children.
Re no.6 - is it in relation to her above mentioned depression and drug and alcohol abuse that you don't think she should have influence? Or is it other reasons?
Why should other parties not get involved in politics? Is it because the 2 majors we have now are doing such a bang up job?
Your response to no 7 is nonsense. Yes, at times, legal processes can cause a lot of grief, but usually the violence was present way before this.