The president of the Fertility Society of Australia, a leading body in the country’s IVF industry, has called for restrictions to Medicare access for women over 45 undergoing fertility treatment.
Why? It’s all about “value for money.”
Professor Michael Chapman, fertility specialist and the president of Fertility Society of Australia, says there is little tax payer value in subsidising the treatment for women over 45. Currently, there is no age limit on accessing Medicare for IVF.
His recommendations come after statistics, released on Friday, showed the fertility treatment outcomes from 2014 – the most recent year for which data is available.
The numbers, Chapman says, don’t add up.
Of 73,598 women who started IVF cycles in 2014, only 19.8 per cent delivered a baby – a 10 per cent improvement from five years earlier.
For women aged 40-44 who received fertility treatment in 2014, the success rate dropped to 6 per cent.
For women aged over 45, the success rate dropped again. To less than one per cent.
It’s certainly a tough concept to put a price on, but Chapman said the cost of a baby per age group can also be broken down by analysing the data.
Top Comments
I don't think that they should completely stop the Medicare support. Maybe they should decrease the benefit every year until you reach a certain age?
I mean, women should be able to make the choice to have a child whenever they feel capable.
Does this mean you'll stop the treatments of illnesses for men and women over a certain age because the outcomes are lower?
This is a very sensitive topic. Whilst I get taxpayers dollars could be used elsewhere, surely they'd be better suited to provide people who actually WANT to have children with the Funds rather than those who just pop kid after kid out for the $$$$
Actually they do restrict some types of medical and surgical treatments for older patients because of very poor outcomes and IVF should not be any different.
No. Their WANT is perfectly understandable, their NEED is questionable.