‘We Consent’ has hit the market in a tech-solution to rape culture among young people today. And it’s a bloody outrage.
Hot off the press today: an ‘anti-rape’ app for your smart phone.
At first, the idea is genius: using the omnipresent smart phone to protect yourself against danger. Is it a loud alarm you can set off if you feel in danger? Maybe a panic button that shoots off a ‘send help’ text message to your friends or family? Or a phone call directly to the police?
Sadly, it’s none of the above.
‘We Consent’ is a new application that instructs the user to record their potential sexual partner in a 20-second video consenting to sexual relations. Notably, they must say the word ‘yes’, otherwise the phone will encourage both people not to proceed.
One word, to solidify their involvement. (I don’t know about you, but jumping into bed with someone usually involves a little more than just saying, ‘yes’…)
It would be easy to explore the lighter side of this situation, pointing out that an iPhone can’t do much (read: anything) to prevent or discourage physical interaction. It could almost be a joke, expecting two people in the heat of the moment to stop, fix their lipstick, straighten their tie, and make a stony-faced confession on video that yes please, they would like to shag you, thanks.
But as a young female with an obligation to other young females and males who could one day potentially find themselves in an incredibly dangerous situation, where the possibility of rape is present, I need to say this instead: THIS APP IS OUTRAGEOUS.
Top Comments
What an excellent app. Don't forget if the lady was drunk or on drugs at the time of saying "yes" that would be taken into account. And the judge would not use it. As well as if she was scared or looked like she was coerced. Read up on college rape. They are trying to change the laws saying if a women is intoxicated then it is like statutory rape. It doesnt matter if she consented or not. The woman is treated like a child or mentally handicapped person. She wasnt in her full state of mind and there fore could not offer consent. And they are asking students to get women to sign consent forms to have sex. So having drunken sex may be a thing of the past.
I seem to be alone in thinking there might be some positives - along with the very real problems lots of people have identified - if people have to actually take a positive step to consent before having sex as it will certainly reduce the instances of he thought she consented, she thought she didn't but he claimed he didn't realise instances. Of course whether or there is a net balance positive we don't know.
One thing that interests me though is the comment that something wrong with it is that it will benefit white people by being useful to athletic teams. I would have thought that whether or not it's a good thing that alleged criminals get a break should not depend on whether they are black or white. But the good news for those who believe it's only a bad thing for alleged rapists to benefit when they are white can be reassured that in the US at least minorities are disproportionately represented on sporting teams.