It’s speech day, and the kids are talking about things that are close to their hearts.
But parents got something they weren’t really expecting last week when, at a Sydney sixth-grade school, a pupil was allowed to deliver a speech called “Why vaccinations should not be compulsory.”
Yes, you read that right: “Why vaccinations should not be compulsory.”
A room full of eager, trusting boys and girls absorbed this dangerous rhetoric when they were meant to be learning.
The school – which we have chosen not to name – allowed the young boy to give the speech several times in a public speaking competition.
Listening to the talk were fellow students – aged between ten and 12 – more used to hearing speeches on “Why the weekends should be shorter “ or “What I would do if I was principal for the day?”
One mother said that when she found out her son had been in the audience for the speech, she was horrified.
“It’s disgraceful. Impressionable kids are now going around spouting this rubbish. It is obviously [a message] from an anti-vaxxer parent.”
Mamamia understands that the child had been competing in a public speaking competition and that he had given the same speech three times.
Whichever child wins the next round of the competition is then allowed to present the speech to a whole school assembly – in front of children of all ages.
“We need to let kids be kids not feed them this bullshit. I had to tell my own child to ignore it,” the mother said. “I was furious.”
Top Comments
I am pro vaccination, I and my children are fully vaccinated, yet I agree with this child that vaccination shouldn't be compulsory. Without knowing the full content of his speech, you can't assume that he was anti-vaccination. Personally, I would certainly prefer that my children were debating contemporary social issues like vaccination rather than talking about what they'd do if they were Principal for a day.
How is being opposed to forced medical procedures "ignorant rhetoric"?