User Comments

yello April 10, 2024

@goat77 Agreed that your school blundered into a big sticking pile with the way they worded their letter. It's certainly inappropriate (and disturbing!) as you noted, and in its choice of words would certainly make the female students feel rightfully vilified and creeped out. It also means that what they were trying to convey (that the uniform be worn as intended) hasn't been respectfully communicated. 

However you point out that the sports shorts are tailored for boys or 'unisex' - I wasn't aware that sports shorts had a gender? I thought they were just shorts that could be worn by either males or females? How do you want the 'girls' shorts to look? And why do you want them to look a certain way?
And sexism is when one gender is unfairly targeted while the other not - I'm pretty sure if a male student flashed his bum cheeks at school he'd be pulled up about it in due haste! And rightly so! Surely bum cheeks of any kind don't belong at school? Which is an environment for school work.
I don't have insight into what goes on at your school specifically, but it's clear that the message about the uniform being worn appropriately is being lost in the delivery in general, in your school and many others.

yello April 9, 2024

I feel like there is a more nuanced conversation that has to be had here. Yes it's outrageous that the parents of the girls at this school have received this letter littered with questionable directives about the impact of their uniform. However these girls are at school to do schoolwork. Not at the gym or at their weekend gatho. 


Most workplaces have attire that is deemed appropriate for that particular job and school is the same. The school uniform is not meant to be a tool used by girls to sexualize themselves, that can be performed by the rest of their wardrobe if they feel so inspired when not at school. For both genders it's intended to be utilitarian and a bit drab. 

It's difficult for schools to tread the line here without sounding draconian but also maybe girls could just recognise that school is not the place for their bum cheeks to be flashing.


yello October 6, 2023

@laura__palmer I'm definitely showing my bias, reflective of the choice I made to parent my own children in their own home (as a university educated woman who had a 'career' before her first child was born). 


And I definitely agree it is a privilege to have been home with my kids, just as I see that it's a privilege to be employed in a job that pays you for your work so you can pay for all the things! To have me at home caring for our children was a financial sacrifice, but an investment in the overall wellbeing of our family. It was the way we chose, not better or worse than anyone else's choice. It need not be devalued by society who deems I should have used my time otherwise in a 'better' pursuit. 

It's not a lifestyle choice to step into our responsibility as parents to the humans we have created. And a family's children don't all enter the school system at the same time, thus younger siblings still need care and why not have that care be in their own homes if that's the chosen path? Let's support women in all their myriad unique circumstances, and know that they're all doing their best given those circumstances rather than belittle any of them!

The point the author posits as far as I can see is to have us value care work equally as much as we value paid employment, not more and not less as is currently the case. An interesting point of discussion would be to explore why that idea is so confronting.

yello October 5, 2023

@laura__palmer I just don't think caring for your own children in your own home is this amazing contribution to society
Umm,  sure, instead let's laud outsourcing the care of our own children in places of care other than their own. That makes perfect sense. Why care for our own children if we can pay others to do it for us? Just as we outsource other inconvenient messy work we'd rather not do if we can afford to pay someone else to do it for us. No need to face the reality of our own existence ever then! As long as we're contributing to the financial gain of society everything is just peachy. 

yello July 5, 2023

Hear hear! I left the world of 'work' to parent my three children,  and it ranks as the most meaningful and purposeful work of my life.  Now that I have returned to paid work after 17 years, I can say without compunction that it is a financial transaction only and that it pales in comparison to the real work of my life in working out how to be a good human being! 'Work' is a construct sold to us as grist for the capitalist mill, and largely moves people away from their true passions or monetises them. Of course essential workers don't fall into this category but most work ain't that sadly!

yello November 12, 2020

Thank you for this, for me this article DID really resonate. Pandemic or no, the fact that we live in image-obsessed times is undeniable, and the crescendo only keeps rising. The shinier the surface the better! Or so the all-pervasive media machine would have us believe, in the the Western world at any rate.
Has the pandemic somehow created a massive shift in the marketing across all media platforms that women are bombarded with on a daily basis? Is body diversity and 'ordinary' beauty (read real and flawed) the norm now on our media platforms? We exclaim upon it when it happens precisely because it's a rarity, rather than the norm, and this site is one that offers such refreshingly candid inroads.
I don't see it on the whole, and any mother of teenage girls wouldn't be seeing it streaming through the devices of their daughters into their eager eyes. Wouldn't it be awesome if it wasn't extraordinary to see ordinary people looking back at you from the images we take in every moment of every day?
So thank you for this story that tells it how it is and gets to the core of what it means to embrace who you are, no matter the wrapping!