By POLITICAL REPORTER STEPHANIE ANDERSON
The Productivity Commission has recommended changes to weekend penalty rates, calling for Sunday rates to be brought into line with Saturday’s time-and-a-half payments.
The recommendations — laid out in the commission’s final report into workplace relations released on Monday — would affect workers in the entertainment, hospitality and retail industries, if adopted.
The commission did not recommend any changes to overtime penalty rates, night penalty rates or shift loadings, nor changes to rates for nurses, teachers or emergency services workers.
“Penalty rates have a legitimate role in compensating employees for working long hours or at asocial times,” it stated.
“However, Sunday penalty rates for hospitality, entertainment, retailing, restaurants and cafes are inconsistent across similar work, anachronistic in the context of changing consumer preferences, and frustrate the job aspirations of the unemployed and those who are only available for work on Sunday.
“Rates should be aligned with those on Saturday, creating a weekend rate for each of the relevant industries.”
Announcing the report’s findings, Employment Minister Michaelia Cash said the Government would examine the recommendations and, if the case for sensible and fair changes to workplace relations were outlined, they would be taken to the next election.
Senator Cash said the commission recommended that penalty rates should continue to be set by the independent Fair Work Commission and the Government has no plan to change the rates itself.
“The only recommendation that the Productivity Commission makes on penalty rates is directed to the independent Fair Work Commission and that is in relation to the weekend penalty rates for the retail and hospitality industry,” she said.
Top Comments
They need to sort out Public Holidays also. Some States give additional days if the PH falls on a weekend, some don't. So this year workers are entitled to 3 Public Holidays over Christmas. Next year they'll get 4. Once you try and give people their 2 RDO days, you end up with staff working 1 or 2 days a week in your busiest period.
As a side we are a cafe and shut Christmas and Boxing Day, so don't expect our workers to work on those days. it is just then frustrating to open again and it is still P/Holiday rates and you have to on-charge that to the customer but to be honest it's not enough because those rates are ridiculous.
I'm torn on this. On one hand I can see the benefit and know that it would lead to more employment but on the other am against it as it will have a negative affect on my family.
My wife works nights & weekends. In doing this she misses out on a lot of family events and time and I think she should be compensated for this. It's not a matter to say get a day time job or one during the week, to do that means we have to pay childcare which negates any benefit.
Just playing Devils Advocate here, why should her employer pay more because you made the choice that her working is more important than family events, etc?
You'll get your butt handed to you on a silver platter Snorks! LOL But I agree with you. Incidentally, I manage a small family business and wages make up at least 50% of expenses in this business and it's just going up and up. I work 5 days a week, plus 1-2 weekends per month, and only get the Christmas/New Year period (1.5 - 2 weeks) off per year. No penalty rates here. And I wouldn't expect to be paid penalty rates. It was what was required of me when I took the job. Everyone sacrifices personal time in some way or another. People need to stop playing the victim card on everything. if you want nice things, house, car, iphones, then you work for it. If you want more expensive things, then you do sacrifice your personal/family time to work extra hours to earn that money to do so.
I firmly believe that the change to the weekend rate WILL mean more business will pay staff which is a WIN. Someone will always be worse off with any decision being made though, but if it gets more employment, and is a little more financially "do-able" for small business, then I'm all for it.
Like I said, I'm torn. I can see both sides of the argument. The best way I could describe it is that if people are employed in undesirable positions they are paid more to attract people to do it and compensate them for doing so.
Fair enough :)
Again, just to be argumentative, if they were undesirable then market forces would push the rates up, sounds like they have plenty of people to fill those positions.